Mosaic Magazine

Response to: "Can Modern Orthodoxy Survive?"August 2014

Let Us Now Praise Modern Orthodoxy

Against all odds, Modern Orthodoxy has successfully mixed serious religious engagement with modern life. Now it just has to retain the courage of its own convictions.

  

According to Jack Wertheimer’s compelling article in Mosaic, Modern Orthodox Jews in America struggle between a rock and a hard place. “A whole set of core Modern Orthodox assumptions,” he asserts, is “under assault” simultaneously from haredi Orthodoxy on the Right and liberal American culture on the Left. As a result of these existential challenges—and even as Modern Orthodoxy remains notable for its “vibrant communal life,” “high levels of observance,” and “serious engagement with traditional texts”—there is, he concludes, “considerable evidence that some practices, and even some values, are changing.”

Wertheimer’s warning is timely. Although Modern Orthodox Jews are highly integrated into American workplaces and society, they—in common with their haredi co-religionists—make it a practice, for example, to avoid live music, recreational swimming, and festive occasions like weddings in the nine days leading up to Tisha b’Av: the annual day of fasting and prayer in memory of the destruction of the ancient Temples which this year fell in early August, coinciding serendipitously with the appearance of Wertheimer’s somewhat mournful essay. By contrast, most non-Orthodox American Jews are probably more aware of Ramadan than of the “nine days.” Wertheimer worries that if Modern Orthodox Jews tilt in that direction, surrendering to the temptations of “an open and radically untraditional American society,” they could end up “distort[ing] traditional Judaism beyond recognition.”

But what is the “traditional Judaism” against which Modern Orthodoxy is being measured, and what comprises “change” or “distortion”? Historically, Wertheimer suggests, traditional Judaism is “the all-embracing religious culture of [Jewish] Eastern Europe”—the same culture that American haredi rabbis, for their part, “strove to recreate” on these shores. In this understanding, haredi Orthodoxy replicates traditional Judaism, authentic and unchanged. 

In actuality, however, both “accommodative” Modern Orthodoxy and “resistive” haredi Orthodoxy (Wertheimer borrows the two terms from the historian Jeffrey Gurock) emerged as strategies for dealing with modernity, and both have implemented changes over the years, albeit in significantly different directions.

In traditionally religious European communities, for example, most men worked for a living; the numbers of talented boys pursuing lengthy yeshiva study were highly limited. Today, by contrast, in haredi communities in America and especially in Israel, “learning,” regardless of aptitude, has replaced working as a male adult norm. Consequently, normal rates of adult productivity are stifled, and haredi families comprise the poorest segments of the American and Israeli Jewish population. Is this “authentic” Judaism?

Fear of modernity has precipitated other haredi changes in Jewish tradition as well. Within contemporary haredi communities, separation of the sexes is exaggerated and demands for female “modesty” reach hysterical extremes: crowding women into the rear of buses, ripping photographs of female faces from documents, posters, and advertisements, and ruling (as one prominent Israeli rabbi has done) that women should wear only dark colors and clothing several sizes too large so that no female form is visible in profile. As one dismayed observer has exclaimed: “Silencing and blotting out is what Jews do to Haman—not to Jewish women!” By delegitimating other streams of Judaism and even the standards of many Orthodox rabbis in the areas of marriage, divorce, and conversion to Judaism, Israel’s haredi-controlled Chief Rabbinate has created unprecedented numbers of women barred from remarrying and long lists of illegitimate Jewish children—a shocking distortion that is certainly alien, if not anathema, to traditional Jewish values.

 

Of course, Modern Orthodox Jews have also changed, and they, too, believe that their changes bring Jews closer to Judaism. Many, for instance, are convinced that the shared-partnership model of marriage typical of today’s Modern Orthodox family strengthens traditional Jewish values. Modern Orthodox Jews have America’s highest rates of “spousal homogamy”: a sociological term for husbands and wives who have attained similar levels of educational and occupational achievement. In turn, they provide their approximately three children per family—double the fertility rate of non-Orthodox Jews—with extraordinarily high levels of Jewish education. Modern Orthodox girls and women pray regularly, and many engage in the study of biblical and rabbinic texts; outside home, school, and synagogue, both men and women devote significant amounts of time to all sorts of Jewish activities. Although Wertheimer notes “defection to more liberal movements,” Modern Orthodoxy’s retention rates have more than doubled since the 1960s, climbing even higher among younger adults.

The Pew Portrait of Jewish Americans, the rich national data set utilized by Wertheimer, posed attitudinal questions that allow us to compare the “values” held by those identifying themselves with different streams of American Judaism. Responding that “being Jewish” is “very important” in their lives were 89 percent of haredi, 89 percent of Modern Orthodox, 69 percent of Conservative, and 44 percent of Reform Jews. Asked about their “connection to the Jewish people,” 99 percent of haredi, 100 percent of Modern Orthodox, 92 percent of Conservative, and 78 percent of Reform Jews reported a “strong sense of belonging.” Modern Orthodox Jews scored dramatically higher than all others when asked whether they were “very” emotionally attached to Israel—77 percent versus 55 percent for haredi, 47 percent for Conservative, and 24 percent for Reform Jews. Similar disparities mark responses to the question, “How essential is caring about Israel to being Jewish?” 

Astonishingly, as Wertheimer notes, some have viewed this strong connection with Israel as evidence of weakness; the fact that numbers of Modern Orthodox American Jews emigrate to Israel can represent, they say, a kind of “commitment drain.” Actually, however, the human connections with children, parents, or cousins who have moved to Israel powerfully reinforce engagement and a sense of international responsibility. Modern Orthodox Jews care about Israel because they have a strong sense of peoplehood, and they have a strong sense of peoplehood because they care about Israel.

 

Modern Orthodox American Jewish life is not idyllic. Among other challenges, some parents feel compelled to abandon personally meaningful careers for higher-paying but less fulfilling positions that will enable them to afford day-school tuition. In some cases, economic pressure influences the decision to curtail family size. Some, unable to meet the material and psychological costs, find themselves alienated from the educational, occupational, and financial homogeneity of American Modern Orthodox communities.

But if complacency about the Modern Orthodox situation is not called for, neither is an inferiority complex. Wertheimer wonders what the consequences would be if, in order in order to minimize the “undermining” of the religious commitments of Modern Orthodox Jews, the movement “should undertake more actively to resist the modern world.” The answer is that such a strategy of isolationism would betray the movement’s signature intellectual and social values. Intellectually, modern science and culture are seen by Modern Orthodoxy as expressions of the Creator, calling not so much for accommodation as for embrace. Socially, active involvement in a broad spectrum of Jewish and civic enterprises has likewise been an important Modern Orthodox value.

Jay Lefkowitz’s much-discussed article, “The Rise of Social Orthodoxy” (Commentary, April 2014), highlights these communal connections: “In totality, the Modern Orthodox are by far the most engaged group of American Jews . . . [as measured by] significantly greater attachment to the State of Israel, . . . participation in Jewish organizations, Jewish community-center programs, Jewish museums and Jewish cultural events, [and] use of the Internet for Jewish purposes.”

In brief, influences from the Right are not necessarily authentic. Influences from the Left are not automatically distortions. By measuring themselves and their broad intellectual interests and social responsibilities against their movement’s own traditional values, Modern Orthodox Jews can continue to display the courage of their convictions.

______________

Sylvia Barack Fishman, the Joseph and Esther Foster professor of Jewish and contemporary life at Brandeis University and co-director of the Hadassah Brandeis Institute, is the author of The Way into the Varieties of Jewishness. Her new book, Love, Marriage, and Jewish Families: Paradoxes of a Social Revolution, is forthcoming next year from Brandeis University Press.

Comments

  • Jacob Sslovich

    As did Jack Wertheimer in his article, the author here fails to distinguish between being open to those aspects and ideas of the world outside of Judaism that are worthwhile and positive (as measured by the standards of Judaism) and to embracing modern science and culture (unless they are so inimical to clear cut Jewish law as to leave absolutely no wiggle room). The first approach will result in the acceptance of much less of, for example modern culture, than the second. Yet it is the second that is the form of Modern Orthodoxy that has historical antecedents among the great Jewish thinkers of the past. The picture of a woman wearing tefilin that appears at the beginning of this article , for example, exemplifies not evaluating and judging by the standards of Judaism the latest ism of the day, but submission to it.

    • Rebecca K.

      I have to completely agree with the end of your statement. The claim “we are the really authentic Jews,” cannot coexist with the endorsement of women wearing tefillin. Never has that practice before been part of normative Torah Judaism. I was also offended by the list of “offences” perpetrated by the Chareidim — most of those extreme examples are 1) rarities played up by the media, but not actually the standard in Israel, 2) not significant issues in America, and I thought the article was about American Modern Orthodoxy. It is telling to me that the author cannot seem to defend Modern Orthodoxy without insulting those to the right.

  • TomSolomon

    Thank you Ms. Fishman for writing such a thoughtful response.
    1) I don’t know what the purpose of the young woman wearing the tefillin is. Presumably, to advance an agenda, somehow. In my MO shul, it is forbidden to do so in public. It seems unrelated and unecessarily provocative.
    2) She makes a valid point when she says that we cannot claim that “authenticity” is what was practiced in past Eastern European cultures, which today’s movements are compare to.
    3) It isn’t clear how having both parents working professionally, and are equally educated, contribute to Jewish family values. It may be an “equal” marriage, but a Jewish one? I think Jewish family values are found more when the wife/mother establishes a Jewish household by having a kosher kitchen, lighting candles, and generally, creating a sense of Jewish warmth and intimacy.
    4) She is (unfortunately) correct in pointing out it takes substantial resources to participate in a MO community. If your kids don’t go to a yeshiva, they are essentially excluded from social activites and friendships are limited. Something I can personally attest to, but at $35k/year per child, Jewish education is beyond my financial reach.

    • Rebecca K.

      I don’t think the problem is women working professionally or attaining education. The problem is the potential for adopting a non-Jewish mindset that a woman isn’t accomplished unless she does those things. There are many women who manage to have jobs and even excel in the workplace (I’m including non-Jews, MO, Hareidim, all of us), but at the same time make building a home (including childcare, food preparation, bikur cholim, speaking words of kindness and encouragement and so on) the center of their lives. Even a woman who is unmarried (for whatever reason) can do this by providing those kindnesses for other members of their family and community, and even people in their workplace. I have a couple friends who are unmarried, with no children, yet are beautifully Jewish women in the traditional sense in that they are constantly helping and building up their colleagues instead of competing with them and treat patients/customers/clients with loving care instead of as merely a means to attain their livelihood. And similarly, there are women I know who have no education past high school, yet have created warm, loving homes filled with happy people.

      • TomSolomon

        Point well taken

  • Dorothy Lipovenko

    For those leaving the hareidi world, there are welcoming, helpful organizations to integrate into secular society. These people eventually find their place in the world.
    But what refuge exists for those of us with a lifelong commitment to being ‘frum’ as we watch, helplessly and hopelessly, Modern Orthodoxy shamelessly shadowing hareidi ultra-Orthodoxy, in thrall to a new kind of Yiddishkeit where one is judged on outward appearances and increasingly restrictive practices?
    I don’t even recognize the sweet, liberal Yiddishkeit I grew up with; it is not I who has walked away, but rather Modern Orthodoxy has left me.
    Look at mechitzas in M.O shuls and how they have changed since the 1970s; they now look the Great of Wall China. How many of us were raised in Shomer Shabbos homes where mothers did not cover their heads, and no one gave it a second thought? But how many of us who chose to not cover our heads after marriage feel pressured into doing so, as a condition of peer and social acceptance?. Resist that and see how far you get trying to make new friends with people who daven in MO shuls who don’t know you. By outward appearance alone will you be judged. Just look at the new uniform of even modern Orthodox women: black skirts.
    Modern Orthodoxy is facing the same stagnation and loss of members as the Conservative movement, only the modern orthos are seeing people siphoned away from big-box shuls to shteibels, and of course, to the brand with the global recognition of Coca-Cola: Chabad.
    As for the whole ‘woman’ thing in Modern Orthodoxy, say goodbye to that.
    At one time, there was a chance to really fix halachic injustices like the get laws. That window of opportunity is closed.

Yadlin

What Now for Israel?

What Now for the United States?
How America can help the new Arab-Israel alliance to resist IS and stabilize the Middle East.
By Michael Doran

Laufer

Holidays

Remembrance of Trumpets Past
Rosh Hashanah as described in the Torah looks very different from the Rosh Hashanah we know today. What happened, and what exactly are we celebrating?
by Nathan Laufer

Facebook Like Box

Karski

The Holocaust

A Tree Grows in Lublin
Remembering Jan Karski, the Pole who told FDR to his face about the Holocaust, and still wondered if he'd done enough.
By Joshua Muravchik

Freundel Wertheimer

Can Modern Orthodoxy Survive?

The Unresolved Dilemmas of Modern Orthodoxy
Everyone agrees that the movement needs to rethink and revamp. Very few agree on how.
By Jack Wertheimer

Fiddler

Tevye Betrayed

What’s Wrong with Fiddler on the Roof
Fifty years on, no work by or about Jews has won American hearts so thoroughly. So what's my problem?
By Ruth R. Wisse

Horn Surnames

What's In A Name

Jewish Surnames [Supposedly] Explained
“Dara, you’ll love this!” Actually, I don’t.
by Dara Horn

Benjamin

The Intellectual Scene

The Walter Benjamin Brigade
How an original but maddeningly opaque German Jewish intellectual became a thriving academic industry.
by Walter Laqueur

Golinkin

Conservative and Orthodox

The Crisis in Jewish Law Today
Orthodox rabbis need to stop worrying about 200-year-old battles with “Reformers” and allow Jewish law to develop organically, as it did in the past.
By David Golinkin

Kook

History

Abraham Isaac Kook Receives the Call
For a visionary rabbi in London, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 signified nothing less than the advent of the messianic era.
by Yehudah Mirsky

Gurfinkiel

The Situation in Europe

You Only Live Twice
Vibrant Jewish communities were reborn in Europe after the Holocaust. Is there a future for them in the 21st century?
by Michel Gurfinkiel

Degenerate Art

The Art World

Degenerate Art and the Jewish Grandmother
The story of the family behind the Nazi-era art trove.
By Walter Laqueur

Wertheimer

The September Essay

Intermarriage: Can Anything Be Done?
A half-century after the rate of intermarriage in the US began to skyrocket, the Jewish community appears to have resigned itself to the inevitable. But to declare defeat is preposterous.
by Jack Wertheimer

Aharon L

The Rabbinic World

Who Is Aharon Lichtenstein?
Introducing the extraordinary rabbi who next week will receive Israel’s highest honor.
By Elli Fischer

Rubinstein

Yom Hashoah

Making Amends
A mysterious request leads the Canadian-born son of a Holocaust survivor back to the old country.
by Robert Eli Rubinstein