The Rabbi, the Rebbetzin, and the Yiddish Poet

One of the foremost Yiddish poets in the decades following World War I, Peretz Markish was born in a Ukrainian shtetl, where his devout father worked as a teacher in a ḥeder. After leaving the Soviet Union in 1921, Markish returned eight years later, modifying his work somewhat to adhere to the party line and receiving accolades from a regime still interested in encouraging “proletarian” Jewish culture. At some point, he also crossed paths with Chana Schneerson (mother of the late Lubavitcher rebbe), whose husband was a prominent rabbi in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. Schneerson would later record the encounter in her memoirs, as Dovid Margolin writes:

It was in 1937—at the high point of his fame—that Markish got news of his father Dovid’s death in Dnepropetrovsk. . . .

“[Dovid Markish] had been a regular [guest] at our home,” wrote [Chana Schneerson]. “Prior to his passing he left instructions that his burial be conducted in accordance with all of [my husband’s] directives.” Hearing the news, Markish and his sister quietly made their way to Dnepropetrovsk. . . .

In utter secrecy, the poet sent his two sisters—one a Communist-party member who served as his secretary and had traveled with him from Moscow, and the other who lived in Dnepropetrovsk, and with whom their father had lived—with a message for the rabbi.

“[The younger Markish] wanted my husband to know that, although he couldn’t meet with him personally, the rabbi should be aware that, regardless of his own personal ideology and prominent position, he held Rabbi Schneerson in the highest esteem. . . . This was based on his own experience and on his father’s frequent letters to him, which made a deep impression on him,” wrote Chana.

Continuing to communicate everything regarding his father through his sister, he asked that everything be kept as quiet as possible. . . . Before leaving, writes Chana, “the [Markish] family donated large sums for the city’s clandestine Torah schools for children and the like, which were conducted at great personal peril to those involved.”

Two years later, Rabbi Schneerson was arrested and exiled to Kazakhstan, where he died in 1944. Markish, who proved useful to Stalin during World War II, was not arrested until 1949. After being tortured, he, along with twelve other Jewish literary figures, was executed by the Soviet political police in August 1952, in the night of the murdered poets.

Read more at Chabad.org

More about: Chabad, History & Ideas, Peretz Markish, Soviet Jewry, USSR, Yiddish literature

 

Hizballah Is Learning Israel’s Weak Spots

On Tuesday, a Hizballah drone attack injured three people in northern Israel. The next day, another attack, targeting an IDF base, injured eighteen people, six of them seriously, in Arab al-Amshe, also in the north. This second attack involved the simultaneous use of drones carrying explosives and guided antitank missiles. In both cases, the defensive systems that performed so successfully last weekend failed to stop the drones and missiles. Ron Ben-Yishai has a straightforward explanation as to why: the Lebanon-backed terrorist group is getting better at evading Israel defenses. He explains the three basis systems used to pilot these unmanned aircraft, and their practical effects:

These systems allow drones to act similarly to fighter jets, using “dead zones”—areas not visible to radar or other optical detection—to approach targets. They fly low initially, then ascend just before crashing and detonating on the target. The terrain of southern Lebanon is particularly conducive to such attacks.

But this requires skills that the terror group has honed over months of fighting against Israel. The latest attacks involved a large drone capable of carrying over 50 kg (110 lbs.) of explosives. The terrorists have likely analyzed Israel’s alert and interception systems, recognizing that shooting down their drones requires early detection to allow sufficient time for launching interceptors.

The IDF tries to detect any incoming drones on its radar, as it had done prior to the war. Despite Hizballah’s learning curve, the IDF’s technological edge offers an advantage. However, the military must recognize that any measure it takes is quickly observed and analyzed, and even the most effective defenses can be incomplete. The terrain near the Lebanon-Israel border continues to pose a challenge, necessitating technological solutions and significant financial investment.

Read more at Ynet

More about: Hizballah, Iron Dome, Israeli Security