In his recently published Alternative Medicine in Halakhah, Rephoel Szmerla, an American ultra-Orthodox rabbi, makes the case that homeopathy, energy healing, and various other irregular medical treatments are not only permitted by Jewish law but in many cases superior—on religious grounds—to scientific medicine. To Ben Rothke, Szmerla’s embrace of “alternative medicine” is an affront to traditional talmudic reasoning and typical of a disturbing growth in certain Orthodox circles of enthusiasm for New Age thinking. Rothke contrasts Szmerla’s specious arguments for the efficacy of various therapies he promotes with the approach to scientific expertise taken by leading 20th-century rabbinic authorities:

Moshe Feinstein frequently called on the scientific knowledge of his son-in-law Moshe Tendler, [himself a distinguished rabbi], who had received his doctorate in microbiology from Columbia University. In Israel, Shlomo Zalman Auerbach relied on experts in biology and physics when addressing halakhic issues that required knowledge of these fields. . . . While [Szmerla] quotes extensively from myriad New Age sources, he does not once refer to any works by non-alternative scientists or medical doctors. . . .

For Szmerla, modern science is not God-focused. He contrasts the opinions of atheistic scientists with those of the creators of alternative therapies, who he feels realize that their healing powers originate from the divine. Both characterizations are overly generalized, and his simplistic observation does nothing to support his claims. [Furthermore], the author does not explain why alternative therapies, which may have their ancient roots in [various pagan religions], may be more acceptable or effective than those from non-believing scientists and doctors such as Linus Pauling or François Jacob.

The New Age movement, with its acceptance of occult practices, pantheism, and a “spirituality without borders or confining dogmas that is inclusive and pluralistic” is anathema to halakhah. Szmerla’s [approach] leads him to promulgate bad science while misrepresenting the thought of the talmudic sages. The danger with Alternative Medicine in Halakhah is that the author oversimplifies both halakhah and the often-complex fields of science and medicine. This leads to his acquiescence in therapies that other major rabbinic authorities outright forbid.

On Tuesday, a Hizballah drone attack injured three people in northern Israel. The next day, another attack, targeting an IDF base, injured eighteen people, six of them seriously, in Arab al-Amshe, also in the north. This second attack involved the simultaneous use of drones carrying explosives and guided antitank missiles. In both cases, the defensive systems that performed so successfully last weekend failed to stop the drones and missiles. Ron Ben-Yishai has a straightforward explanation as to why: the Lebanon-backed terrorist group is getting better at evading Israel defenses. He explains the three basis systems used to pilot these unmanned aircraft, and their practical effects:

These systems allow drones to act similarly to fighter jets, using “dead zones”—areas not visible to radar or other optical detection—to approach targets. They fly low initially, then ascend just before crashing and detonating on the target. The terrain of southern Lebanon is particularly conducive to such attacks.

But this requires skills that the terror group has honed over months of fighting against Israel. The latest attacks involved a large drone capable of carrying over 50 kg (110 lbs.) of explosives. The terrorists have likely analyzed Israel’s alert and interception systems, recognizing that shooting down their drones requires early detection to allow sufficient time for launching interceptors.

The IDF tries to detect any incoming drones on its radar, as it had done prior to the war. Despite Hizballah’s learning curve, the IDF’s technological edge offers an advantage. However, the military must recognize that any measure it takes is quickly observed and analyzed, and even the most effective defenses can be incomplete. The terrain near the Lebanon-Israel border continues to pose a challenge, necessitating technological solutions and significant financial investment.