Revisiting his 2013 essay in Mosaic, Robert Nicholson explains why the land of Israel is important to evangelical Christians like himself, how this attachment translates into friendship with the Jewish state, why Jews—and especially the non-Orthodox—are skeptical of, or even hostile to, evangelical support, and the danger of a younger generation of evangelicals moving away from the pro-Israel stance of their elders. He also discusses the effects of Donald Trump’s presidency on existing divides within the evangelical community and his own thoughts on American recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. (Interview by Eric Cohen. Audio, 38 minutes. Options for streaming and download are available at the link below.)
Evangelical Christians, Israel, and the Jews
Mahmoud Abbas Comes to the UN to Walk away from the Negotiating Table
On Tuesday, the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, addressed the United Nations Security Council during one of its regular discussions of the “Palestine question.” He used the opportunity to elaborate on the Palestinians’ “5,000-year history” in the land of Israel, after which he moved on to demand—among other things—that the U.S. reverse its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The editors of the Weekly Standard comment:
It’s convenient for Abbas to suggest a condition to which he knows the United States won’t accede. It allows him to do what he does best—walk away from the table. Which is what he did on Tuesday, literally. After his speech, Abbas and his coterie of bureaucrats walked out of the council chamber, snubbing the next two speakers, the Israeli ambassador Danny Danon and the U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley, . . . [in order to have his] photograph taken with the Belgian foreign minister.
Abbas has neither the power nor the will to make peace. It’s the perennial problem afflicting Palestinian leadership. If he compromises on the alleged “right of return”—the chimerical idea that Palestinians can re-occupy the lands from which they [or their ancestors] fled, in effect obliterating the Israeli state—he will be deposed by political adversaries. Thus his contradictory strategy: to prolong his pageantry in international forums such as the UN, and to fashion himself a “moderate” even as he finances and incites terror. He seems to believe time is on his side. But it’s not. He’s eighty-two. While he continues his performative intransigence, he further immiserates the people he claims to represent.
In a sense, it was entirely appropriate that Abbas walked out. In that sullen act, he [exemplified] his own approach to peacemaking: when difficulties arise, vacate the premises and seek out photographers.