How an Italian Director Turned the Book of Maccabees into a Very Christian Film

The first and second books of Maccabees—on which the Hanukkah story is based—are not part of the Hebrew Bible, but they are included in Catholic and other Christian Scriptures. The books also inspired two Italian-made films, the 1911 I Maccabei and the 1962 Il Vecchio Testamento. Considering the latter, whose name curiously means “The Old Testament,” and which was intended for Italian, French, and American audiences, Matt Page writes:

The first book of Maccabees tells the story of Mattathias and his five sons John, Simon, Judas [i.e., Judah], Eleazar, and Jonathan, but the second zooms in to focus on the life of Judas. . . . [The director Gianfranco] Parolini’s version of the story, however, chooses a different path. Instead of making Judas the main hero, it opts for his brother Simon. . . . Judas is [portrayed] as something of an extremist, a man of violence. . . . It may be that . . . the filmmakers decided they needed a violent rebel to contrast with their more peaceable hero, but it’s also possible they worried that Christian-majority audiences in both Italy and America might not accept a hero named Judas. . . .

Whereas Judas had already been fighting the Syrian-Greeks [by the time the film’s action starts, his brother] Simon has been becoming friends with them. We first meet him dressed in Greek-style dress socializing with his soon-to-be wife Diotima and his best friend Antenone. As the conflict between the Syrians and the Jews intensifies, the dynamics between these three become more interesting. All three represent the more peaceable, moderate side of their people and are angered when their own countrymen inflict suffering on their friends. Early on in the film, Simon is shot by an arrow and Antenone nurses him to recover.

Later on, Antenone is executed by Jewish forces much to Simon’s dismay, [while] his spirit is shown to rise up in bodily form. This not only reflects the theological development we find in 2Maccabees of belief in some kind of afterlife, but also hands it to Antenone, a peaceable Gentile, rather than to the Jewish Mattathias, Judas, or Jonathan. While the absence of a resurrection for any of the Jewish heroes was not necessarily intended as a slight, certainly it reaffirms the film’s attempts to idealize a more compromising, peaceable approach over a specific religious conviction.

Alternatively the point could be made that [the film] attempts to de-Judaize these quintessentially Jewish heroes in order to portray their story as part of the journey toward a more “superior,” “tolerant,” Americanized Christianity. Of Mattathias and his five sons, it is the one who is least Jewish and most in tune with the dominant cultural empire who is promoted to become the hero, and it is a non-Jew who is resurrected and later portrayed as something of a Christ figure in the film’s closing moments.

Read more at Bible Films Blog

More about: Arts & Culture, Bible, Film, Maccabees

What a Strategic Victory in Gaza Can and Can’t Achieve

On Tuesday, the Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant met in Washington with Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Gallant says that he told the former that only “a decisive victory will bring this war to an end.” Shay Shabtai tries to outline what exactly this would entail, arguing that the IDF can and must attain a “strategic” victory, as opposed to merely a tactical or operational one. Yet even after a such a victory Israelis can’t expect to start beating their rifles into plowshares:

Strategic victory is the removal of the enemy’s ability to pose a military threat in the operational arena for many years to come. . . . This means the Israeli military will continue to fight guerrilla and terrorist operatives in the Strip alongside extensive activity by a local civilian government with an effective police force and international and regional economic and civil backing. This should lead in the coming years to the stabilization of the Gaza Strip without Hamas control over it.

In such a scenario, it will be possible to ensure relative quiet for a decade or more. However, it will not be possible to ensure quiet beyond that, since the absence of a fundamental change in the situation on the ground is likely to lead to a long-term erosion of security quiet and the re-creation of challenges to Israel. This is what happened in the West Bank after a decade of relative quiet, and in relatively stable Iraq after the withdrawal of the United States at the end of 2011.

Read more at BESA Center

More about: Gaza War 2023, Hamas, IDF