While their exotic dress may be their most salient characteristic to outsiders, hats, caftans, and stockings are far from the only religiously significant objects for Ḥasidim. In Hasidic Art and the Kabbalah, Batsheva Goldman-Ida explores a wide array of objects that have come to be invested with meaning, and often elaborate mystical symbolism, in ḥasidic thought and culture. Glenn Dynner writes in his review:

What exactly constitutes a sacred object can be rather surprising. Seder plates and prayer shawls, to be sure. But pipes, snuffboxes, and chairs? The sacralization of functional objects illustrates Ḥasidism’s infectious optimism about the potential holiness of things. That optimism even extended to non-Jewish decorative art forms like galanterie (luxury objects) and Russian lubok (folk) prints, which heavily influenced the designs of multitiered, intricately engraved seder plates. From the ḥasidic perspective, the foreign art forms were redeemed through their incarnation as ritual objects, [the “redemption” of the profane being a fundamental concept of ḥasidic mysticism]. . . .

Each of the objects detailed in [Goldman-Ida’s] pioneering contribution to Jewish art history alludes to an aspect of the divine for those who are in the know. . . . The letters in a prayer book rendered in unique calligraphy, we learn, hint at the letters with which God spoke the world into existence. . . . A prayer-shawl ornament known as an atarah [meaning “crown”] evokes the crown that angels weave from our prayers and place on God’s head. The rebbe’s pipe helps him uplift souls’ [sacred] sparks and reenact his own entry into the divine realm.

In a very different way, Marcin Wodziński’s Historical Atlas of Hasidism helps readers visualize this religious movement—not through art, but through geography. Dynner writes:

Several [of this volume’s] maps reflect real ingenuity. Who would have thought to produce a map of the socioeconomic status of ḥasidic groups based on contemporaneous accounts of each dynasty’s relative affluence? Or a series of layouts of ḥasidic courts and prayer halls in various towns? Yet here they, furnished with vivid photographs of spaces, places, documents, and people wherever possible. . . . Perhaps the most intriguing maps are those based on tallying up hundreds of early 20th-century prayer halls (shtiblekh) affiliated with ḥasidic dynasties, which are used to gauge each dynasty’s popularity. . . . Together, such maps constitute the most complete sketch of ḥasidic dynastic expansion available.

On Tuesday, a Hizballah drone attack injured three people in northern Israel. The next day, another attack, targeting an IDF base, injured eighteen people, six of them seriously, in Arab al-Amshe, also in the north. This second attack involved the simultaneous use of drones carrying explosives and guided antitank missiles. In both cases, the defensive systems that performed so successfully last weekend failed to stop the drones and missiles. Ron Ben-Yishai has a straightforward explanation as to why: the Lebanon-backed terrorist group is getting better at evading Israel defenses. He explains the three basis systems used to pilot these unmanned aircraft, and their practical effects:

These systems allow drones to act similarly to fighter jets, using “dead zones”—areas not visible to radar or other optical detection—to approach targets. They fly low initially, then ascend just before crashing and detonating on the target. The terrain of southern Lebanon is particularly conducive to such attacks.

But this requires skills that the terror group has honed over months of fighting against Israel. The latest attacks involved a large drone capable of carrying over 50 kg (110 lbs.) of explosives. The terrorists have likely analyzed Israel’s alert and interception systems, recognizing that shooting down their drones requires early detection to allow sufficient time for launching interceptors.

The IDF tries to detect any incoming drones on its radar, as it had done prior to the war. Despite Hizballah’s learning curve, the IDF’s technological edge offers an advantage. However, the military must recognize that any measure it takes is quickly observed and analyzed, and even the most effective defenses can be incomplete. The terrain near the Lebanon-Israel border continues to pose a challenge, necessitating technological solutions and significant financial investment.