In addition to its military buildup in Syria, and its longstanding presence in Lebanon, Iran has begun sending medium-range missiles to its Shiite proxy militias in Iraq—which could be used to retaliate against future Israeli strikes on Iranian infrastructure in Syria. Alex Fishman explains the dilemma this move creates for the Jewish state:

[M]issile fire from Iraq would not give Israel just cause to attack Syria or Lebanon. [Yet a retaliatory] attack on Iraq requires coordination with the U.S., which has already informed Israel that any military action it takes in Iraq would endanger the lives of Americans protecting the Baghdad regime. It would also require coordination with neighboring countries such as Jordan and Saudi Arabia to allow the Israel Air Force warplanes to fly in their airspace. It’s obvious these countries will [be reluctant] to cooperate openly with Israel in attacking a neighboring Arab nation.

This threat reminds Fishman of Israel intelligence’s discovery in April 1990—before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait—of Scud missiles positioned in the same part of Iraq. When, in January of the following year, Saddam Hussein began firing these at Israeli cities, the IDF considered responses ranging from attacks on Iraqi shipping to the intensive bombing of Baghdad, together with the insertion of ground troops. But a combination of operational uncertainty and U.S. pressure prevented Jerusalem from responding, leaving repercussions to this day:

In total, some 40 missiles were fired from Iraq, most of them at the [northern] Dan region. Israel didn’t respond, and it is paying the price in psychological deterrence to this very day. The enemy learned Israel’s Achilles’ heel. Even Hamas [now] dares to launch rockets at Tel Aviv, and still remains standing. The Gulf War created the “ethos of restraint,” which in the years that have passed has become a doctrine. . . .

Today, as [the new IDF chief-of-staff] Aviv Kochavi prepares the army for the post-civil-war era in Syria, he must take into account the fact that Israel will always be subject to political pressure from a power that would deny it freedom of action—whether it is the Americans in Iran or the Russians in Syria.

While it is commendable that administrators of several universities finally called upon police to crack down on violent and disruptive anti-Israel protests, the actions they have taken may be insufficient. At Columbia, demonstrators reestablished their encampment on the main quad after it had been cleared by the police, and the university seems reluctant to use force again. The school also decided to hold classes remotely until the end of the semester. Such moves, whatever their merits, do nothing to fix the factors that allowed campuses to become hotbeds of pro-Hamas activism in the first place. The editors of National Review examine how things go to this point:

Since the 10/7 massacre, Columbia’s Jewish students have been forced to endure routine calls for their execution. It shouldn’t have taken the slaughter, rape, and brutalization of Israeli Jews to expose chants like “Globalize the intifada” and “Death to the Zionist state” as calls for violence, but the university refused to intervene on behalf of its besieged students. When an Israeli student was beaten with a stick outside Columbia’s library, it occasioned little soul-searching from faculty. Indeed, it served only as the impetus to establish an “Anti-Semitism Task Force,” which subsequently expressed “serious concerns” about the university’s commitment to enforcing its codes of conduct against anti-Semitic violators.

But little was done. Indeed, as late as last month the school served as host to speakers who praised the 10/7 attacks and even “hijacking airplanes” as “important tactics that the Palestinian resistance have engaged in.”

The school’s lackadaisical approach created a permission structure to menace and harass Jewish students, and that’s what happened. . . . Now is the time finally to do something about this kind of harassment and associated acts of trespass and disorder. Yale did the right thing when police cleared out an encampment [on Monday]. But Columbia remains a daily reminder of what happens when freaks and haters are allowed to impose their will on campus.