First published in 1929, Ursula Parrott’s Ex-Wife was a major commercial success, which MGM quickly adopted as the film The Divorcee. Its narrator and protagonist, Patricia, is a young woman who finds out—not unlike many young people today—that the revolt against traditional morality isn’t all it’s cracked up to be:

Patricia writes ad copy and is making her way up in the world of fashion-magazine publishing in New York City. At nineteen, she met Peter, a career-focused newspaper reporter, and they married. . . . The couple move to Greenwich Village, [and] struggle for a bit to make ends meet before becoming financially secure. Their lives are much taken up with parties and the alcohol-fueled sexual freedom of the time. Yet the supposed sophistication and egalitarianism of their generation break down when met with reality. Peter sleeps with another woman and tells Patricia. “He and I were very definitely committed to the honesty policy,” she tells us. “I made no scene about it—and I never felt about Peter, after, quite as I had before.”

A few months later she returns the favor with a close friend of Peter, then . . . discovers that “all the theories about the right to experiment and the desirability of varied experience—theories that had seemed so adequate in discussing the sexual adventures of acquaintances—were no help at all when the decision concerned Peter and me.”

After the ensuing divorce, she goes on to discover the disappointments of what would now be dubbed “hook-up culture.” To Michael Weingrad, Ex-Wife, “for all its occasional sentimentality, is shot through with wit, social critique, sexual anthropology, and passages of deft lyricism.” Weingrad also considers the patrician author’s numerous Jewish characters:

Ex-Wife is also a New York novel. One of its more interesting aspects in this regard is its treatment of Jews, who made up more than a quarter of the city’s population in the 1920s, and are referenced in three of the book’s episodes. . . . In each case the Jewish character is connected with the dislocation, vulnerability, and loss Patricia experiences after the collapse of her marriage.

Yet the largely unjudgmental and even, in two out of three cases, sympathetic treatments of these characters, constitute a difference from New York novels that use Jews as markers of social upheaval, such as Edith Wharton’s The House of Mirth with its strangely sympathetic parvenu Simon Rosedale, or the crude Jewish stereotype in [Jay] McInerney’s Bright Lights, Big City, one of that novel’s anxious laments over the passing away of the WASP establishment. The Jews in Ex-Wife, by contrast, are neither crude stereotypes nor a cultural index, even if they owe their presence in the book to the narrator’s personal chaos.

Analyzing the recent direct Iranian attack on Israel, and Israel’s security situation more generally, Michael Oren looks to the 2015 agreement to restrain Iran’s nuclear program. That, and President Biden’s efforts to resurrect the deal after Donald Trump left it, are in his view the source of the current crisis:

Of the original motivations for the deal—blocking Iran’s path to the bomb and transforming Iran into a peaceful nation—neither remained. All Biden was left with was the ability to kick the can down the road and to uphold Barack Obama’s singular foreign-policy achievement.

In order to achieve that result, the administration has repeatedly refused to punish Iran for its malign actions:

Historians will survey this inexplicable record and wonder how the United States not only allowed Iran repeatedly to assault its citizens, soldiers, and allies but consistently rewarded it for doing so. They may well conclude that in a desperate effort to avoid getting dragged into a regional Middle Eastern war, the U.S. might well have precipitated one.

While America’s friends in the Middle East, especially Israel, have every reason to feel grateful for the vital assistance they received in intercepting Iran’s missile and drone onslaught, they might also ask what the U.S. can now do differently to deter Iran from further aggression. . . . Tehran will see this weekend’s direct attack on Israel as a victory—their own—for their ability to continue threatening Israel and destabilizing the Middle East with impunity.

Israel, of course, must respond differently. Our target cannot simply be the Iranian proxies that surround our country and that have waged war on us since October 7, but, as the Saudis call it, “the head of the snake.”