The Greatest Finds of Israeli Archaeology

Having consulted with some of the foremost experts on the subject, Amanda Borschel-Dan details some of the most important archaeological discoveries in the land of Israel. The experts named the tomb of Herod, cutting-edge research using biology and genetics, and, of course, the Dead Sea Scrolls as some of the most significant finds of the past 70 years. Amidst these discoveries, controversies surrounding the correct approach to the Bible have not abated:

“A major debate in the last 40 years is the historicity of the Hebrew Bible,” Yosef Garfinkel, head of the Institute of Archaeology at Hebrew University [said]. In recent decades, there have been several discoveries that could be interpreted as shoring up biblical narratives, several of which were found in Jerusalem’s ancient Old City. The most recent among them was a clay seal impression bearing what could be the name of the prophet Isaiah, discovered by Eilat Mazar in her recently renewed Jerusalem excavations. . . .

Garfinkel [names] several other examples of archaeological evidence in support of the biblical narrative. . . . “A few finds indicate that the Bible indeed bears historical memories,” said Garfinkel, who is directing archaeological expeditions to Khirbet Qeiyafa, Tel Lachish, and Khirbet er-Rai.

Garfinkel said excavations of the fortified city of Khirbet Qeiyafa “indicates urban society in Judah at the time of King David.” A portable shrine found at Khirbet Qeiyafa “indicates royal architecture in Judah at the time of David and Solomon.” According to Garfinkel, “the biblical text described [similar] architecture that was used at that era.” . . .

But foremost among the findings that both Aren Maeir [of Bar-Ilan University] and Garfinkel highlight is the Tel Dan stele discovered in secondary use in 1993 bearing an inscription on a 9th-century-BCE stone slab that mentions “House of David.” The stone and its fragmentary inscription is called by some the “first historical evidence of King David.” . . . While not naming the fabled king specifically, . . . it does recount the victory of an Aramean king over his two southern neighbors: the “king of Israel” and the “king of the House of David.”

Read more at Times of Israel

More about: Ancient Israel, Archaeology, Davidic monarchy, Hebrew Bible, History & Ideas

What a Strategic Victory in Gaza Can and Can’t Achieve

On Tuesday, the Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant met in Washington with Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Gallant says that he told the former that only “a decisive victory will bring this war to an end.” Shay Shabtai tries to outline what exactly this would entail, arguing that the IDF can and must attain a “strategic” victory, as opposed to merely a tactical or operational one. Yet even after a such a victory Israelis can’t expect to start beating their rifles into plowshares:

Strategic victory is the removal of the enemy’s ability to pose a military threat in the operational arena for many years to come. . . . This means the Israeli military will continue to fight guerrilla and terrorist operatives in the Strip alongside extensive activity by a local civilian government with an effective police force and international and regional economic and civil backing. This should lead in the coming years to the stabilization of the Gaza Strip without Hamas control over it.

In such a scenario, it will be possible to ensure relative quiet for a decade or more. However, it will not be possible to ensure quiet beyond that, since the absence of a fundamental change in the situation on the ground is likely to lead to a long-term erosion of security quiet and the re-creation of challenges to Israel. This is what happened in the West Bank after a decade of relative quiet, and in relatively stable Iraq after the withdrawal of the United States at the end of 2011.

Read more at BESA Center

More about: Gaza War 2023, Hamas, IDF