No, the Israeli Supreme Court Isn’t above Criticism

April 18 2016

In the wake of the Israeli court’s decision overturning the deal to exploit the country’s offshore gas reserves, Ayelet Shaked, the justice minister, has joined the chorus of voices criticizing the ruling. She has since been attacked for her comments on the grounds that it is inappropriate for a sitting cabinet member to express disagreement with the supreme court. Eugene Kontorovich argues that such criticism is not only appropriate but important:

The legitimacy of such criticism can be seen from the very form that judicial decisions take. When courts in countries with Anglo-American legal traditions, [including Israel], decide even routine cases, they issue written opinions. . . .

Why should the court not simply point to the winner? It is because the force of an opinion of the court derives from its logic and reasoning, from how well it follows prior cases and existing law. Opinions are published because the government and public are not supposed to nod meekly and accept the court’s decisions. The requirement to reveal their reasoning presupposes the legitimacy of criticizing decisions based on their rationale, or lack thereof.

All this is even more relevant for the Israel’s supreme court, which has given itself the power to negate the action of elected governments even without any written constitution, based on general principles like “reasonableness.”

In other Western democracies, the independence of the courts is part of a system of checks and balances—where the courts check the political branches and vice versa. Such checks include the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty that keeps courts from overturning certain laws, or the ability of the government to appoint the judges. In Israel, none of these checks is available. Indeed, political criticism is perhaps the only check there is, and it is minor and ineffective.

Get unlimited access to Mosaic: Subscribe now

Welcome to Mosaic

Register now to get two more stories FREE.

Register Now

Get unlimited access to Mosaic: Subscribe now

Welcome to Mosaic

Register now to get two more stories FREE.

Register Now

Read more at Jerusalem Post

More about: Israel & Zionism, Israeli gas, Israeli politics, Natural Gas, Supreme Court of Israel

The UN’s New Blacklist of Israeli Businesses Threatens Palestinians Most of All

Feb. 18 2020

Last week, the United Nations Human Rights Council publicized a database of 112 companies—94 of which are based in Israel—that do business in “Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory [sic], including East Jerusalem.” This list, three years in the making, evidently serves as a guide for those wishing, or promoting, a boycott of the Jewish state. As Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik explain in a detailed report, such a boycott would above all hurt Palestinians:

Sign up to read more.

You've read all your free articles for this month. Sign up now for unlimited access to the best in Jewish thought, culture and politics.

Register Now

Sign up to read more.

You've read all your free articles for this month. Sign up now for unlimited access to the best in Jewish thought, culture and politics.

Register Now

Read more at Palestinian Media Watch

More about: BDS, Palestinian economy, UNHRC