What the U.S. Retreat from the Middle East Means for Israel https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/israel-zionism/2016/08/what-the-u-s-retreat-from-the-middle-east-means-for-israel/

August 2, 2016 | Efraim Inbar
About the author: Efraim Inbar is president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security (JISS).

Over the past eight years, America has been steadily disengaging from the Middle East. Among the results, writes Efraim Inbar, are Iranian regional ascendancy, the likelihood of further nuclear proliferation, the rise of Islamic State, an emboldened Russia, and bloody chaos in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere. And then there are the consequences for Israel:

The perception that Washington will come to Israel’s aid in times of need has been a longstanding and important component of Jerusalem’s ability to project a deterrent threat. The new perception of the U.S. administration as a vacillating ally damages that deterrent capability. In addition, Washington’s attempt to compensate its Arab allies for the Iranian nuclear deal by providing them with the latest state-of-the-art weapons erodes Israel’s qualitative advantage.

[But] the U.S. exit from the Middle East ironically also increases Israel’s leeway to do as it sees fit. It is burdened with less of an obligation to weigh the consequences of its own actions on U.S. interests and personnel in the region. Moreover, if the next American administration employs the logic of “offshore balancing,” whereby one country uses favored regional powers to check the rise of potentially hostile powers, Washington’s dependence on Jerusalem is likely to increase, as Israel is the strongest and friendliest military power in a highly volatile region.

Lastly, Washington’s disengagement from the Middle East appears to close the book on the longstanding U.S. support for liberty and for democratic movements around the globe. It undermines the relatively small and weak pro-democratic forces in the Arab world, which need greater U.S. involvement and support for their causes. . . .

For the time being, there is no alternative to a responsible and well calibrated U.S. role in world affairs. An assertive U.S. position is also important for spreading the values for which [America] stands—democracy and the free market. Abdicating this role is simply irresponsible.

Read more on BESA Center: http://besacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/MSPS122.pdf