The UN’s Anti-Israel Coalition Is Fraying https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/israel-zionism/2018/06/the-uns-anti-israel-coalition-is-fraying/

June 19, 2018 | Elliott Abrams
About the author: Elliott Abrams is a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations and is the chairman of the Tikvah Fund.

There is no doubt that slandering Israel remains a major preoccupation of the United Nations—as evidenced by the recent General Assembly resolution condemning Jerusalem’s actions at the Gaza border while making no mention of Hamas. But Elliott Abrams sees signs that change is afoot:

The final resolution [regarding Gaza] passed 120 (yes) to 8 (no) with 45 abstentions. Who were the eight countries voting no? The United States and Israel, several Pacific island states, Togo, and Australia. Last year Australia’s government announced that it was through with unfair and unbalanced UN treatment of Israel and would henceforth vote against such resolutions in all parts of the UN system. And so it has done. . . .

In the General Assembly [debate], the United States introduced an amendment that inserted a condemnation of Hamas in the [proposed] resolution text. . . . Algeria moved to quash the American amendment, but, remarkably, the United States won that vote 78 to 59 (with 42 abstentions). That is an amazing event in the UN: 78 countries opposed the Arab position and voted on the U.S./Israeli side, and only 59 supported the Algerian [motion].

There was then a vote on whether to adopt the American amendment . . . : the amendment passed 62 (yes) to 58 (no), with 42 abstentions. In the UN, that is an astonishing result—a slim margin to be sure, but a win nevertheless. Because UN rules require a two-thirds majority, the amendment was not in the end adopted—but the voting pattern is far better than many past UN votes. And in this skirmish, all 28 EU countries voted with the United States. That’s the good news. . . .

Future progress will require more diplomatic work, by Israel and the United States. Additional votes can be changed, in Latin America, Africa, and perhaps Europe.

Read more on Pressure Points: https://www.cfr.org/blog/uns-automatic-majority-against-israel-fraying