The Barriers to Israeli-Palestinian Dialogue

Aug. 30 2018

In his book Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor, published in May, Yossi Klein Halevi attempts to explain the Israeli “narrative” to an imagined Palestinian correspondent, in an effort to foster the sort of dialogue and mutual understanding that he believes must precede peace. Reviewing the book for the New York Times, the Palestinian writer Raja Shehadeh has criticized it for, in effect, attempting to win Palestinians over to the Israeli perspective. Klein Halevi responds in an open letter to Shehadeh:

My intention was not, as you write, to turn Palestinians into “Zionists, to embrace the narrative of Jewish suffering and redemption . . . as a prerequisite to peace.” In my book I repeatedly write that neither side can or should abandon its narrative, that we are peoples who define themselves by their stories. Your book didn’t lead me to replace my people’s narrative with yours. But you helped me . . . open myself to another perspective.

A prerequisite for peace is that we stop denying the right of the other to exist—to define itself as a people with rights to sovereignty in this land. I don’t expect Palestinians to accept my narrative of what happened in 1948 or 1967. But neither do I see how peace is possible if the Palestinian national movement continues to tell a story about the Jews that denies our very identity as a people with a 4,000-year connection to this land.

You write that you have Israeli friends and have made “serious attempts . . . to appreciate their worldviews.” But most Palestinians have not had that opportunity. Instead, what they hear in their media is a relentless denial of any legitimacy of Jewish history. What Palestinians “know” about the Jews is that we invented our ancient presence here, distorted the archaeological evidence, [and] lied about the existence of a temple on the Temple Mount. That is the normative and unchallenged account of my people’s story in your people’s public space.

I have received some moving responses to my book from Palestinians who, along with their deep criticisms of Israel, write that the time has come for Palestinians to come to terms with the legitimacy of the Jewish presence. But almost all of them have asked that I not publicize their names because of fear of retribution. Can one publicly say, in Palestinian society today, that this land belongs to two peoples, that this is a conflict between two legitimate narratives, that the Jews are uprooted natives who returned home?

Read more at Times of Israel

More about: Israel & Zionism, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Yossi Klein Halevi

Expand Gaza into Sinai

Feb. 11 2025

Calling the proposal to depopulate Gaza completely (if temporarily) “unworkable,” Peter Berkowitz makes the case for a similar, but more feasible, plan:

The United States along with Saudi Arabia and the UAE should persuade Egypt by means of generous financial inducements to open the sparsely populated ten-to-fifteen miles of Sinai adjacent to Gaza to Palestinians seeking a fresh start and better life. Egypt would not absorb Gazans and make them citizens but rather move Gaza’s border . . . westward into Sinai. Fences would be erected along the new border. The Israel Defense Force would maintain border security on the Gaza-extension side, Egyptian forces on the other. Egypt might lease the land to the Palestinians for 75 years.

The Sinai option does not involve forced transfer of civilian populations, which the international laws of war bar. As the United States, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and other partners build temporary dwellings and then apartment buildings and towns, they would provide bus service to the Gaza-extension. Palestinian families that choose to make the short trip would receive a key to a new residence and, say, $10,000.

The Sinai option is flawed. . . . Then again, all conventional options for rehabilitating and governing Gaza are terrible.

Read more at RealClear Politics

More about: Donald Trump, Egypt, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula