The Abrupt Resignation of a Progressive Theological Seminary’s First Jewish President—Who Made the Mistake of Professing His Zionism

Founded in 1962 in Berkeley, California as a consortium of five Protestant institutions, the Graduate Theological Union (GTU) has since expanded to include eight schools, each representing a different Christian denomination, and several academic centers for the study of other religions, Judaism and Islam among them. In October of last year, it formally inaugurated its first non-Christian president—Rabbi Daniel Lehman—who had already held the job for a year. While GTU celebrated Lehman’s inauguration with much fanfare as a milestone of pluralism and tolerance, it had little to say when he left the position four months later.

Gabe Stutman concludes that the most probable explanation for Lehman’s departure is his Zionism. Likely responsible for his resignation is Alison Weir, a professional anti-Israel obsessive who lacks the tact to disguise her prejudice solely in left-wing clothing, happily rubbing elbows with anti-Semites ranging from Nation of Islam leaders to “Christian-identity” conspiracy theorists. Stutman writes:

Opposition surfaced publicly last September, a month before the inauguration, via an article on [the] anti-Israel news website, Israel-Palestine News. The site is run by Alison Weir. . . . At the inauguration, Weir and two others, described as “seventy-year-old peace advocates,” were asked to leave the event after handing out “fact sheets” critical of Lehmann. They read: “Will pro-Israel Rabbi Lehmann change GTU’s focus on justice and human rights?”

“Lehmann publicly emphasizes that he is a Zionist,” the handouts [accurately] stated. “Apparently in disregard for Israel’s oppression of Palestinians.”

Those criticisms would eventually find purchase with more than 100 GTU alumni and a host of Bay Area clergy, who signed an open letter to the board of trustees expressing “concern” about Lehmann’s appointment. The letter, written by three Bay Area ministers who are alumni of GTU, described Lehmann’s views as “Islamophobic,” “racist,” and at odds “with the professed mission of GTU.” Lehmann is a “self-described Zionist,” the letter read.

GTU is a progressive institution. . . . The school has hosted pro-Palestinian events in the past, including a talk on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by the anti-Zionist [and pro-Hamas and -Hizballah], Jewish author Judith Butler.

One of the only news outlets to cover Lehmann’s departure was Weir’s.

Read more at Jewish News of Northern California

More about: Anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionism, Ecumenicism, Israel on campus

How Columbia Failed Its Jewish Students

While it is commendable that administrators of several universities finally called upon police to crack down on violent and disruptive anti-Israel protests, the actions they have taken may be insufficient. At Columbia, demonstrators reestablished their encampment on the main quad after it had been cleared by the police, and the university seems reluctant to use force again. The school also decided to hold classes remotely until the end of the semester. Such moves, whatever their merits, do nothing to fix the factors that allowed campuses to become hotbeds of pro-Hamas activism in the first place. The editors of National Review examine how things go to this point:

Since the 10/7 massacre, Columbia’s Jewish students have been forced to endure routine calls for their execution. It shouldn’t have taken the slaughter, rape, and brutalization of Israeli Jews to expose chants like “Globalize the intifada” and “Death to the Zionist state” as calls for violence, but the university refused to intervene on behalf of its besieged students. When an Israeli student was beaten with a stick outside Columbia’s library, it occasioned little soul-searching from faculty. Indeed, it served only as the impetus to establish an “Anti-Semitism Task Force,” which subsequently expressed “serious concerns” about the university’s commitment to enforcing its codes of conduct against anti-Semitic violators.

But little was done. Indeed, as late as last month the school served as host to speakers who praised the 10/7 attacks and even “hijacking airplanes” as “important tactics that the Palestinian resistance have engaged in.”

The school’s lackadaisical approach created a permission structure to menace and harass Jewish students, and that’s what happened. . . . Now is the time finally to do something about this kind of harassment and associated acts of trespass and disorder. Yale did the right thing when police cleared out an encampment [on Monday]. But Columbia remains a daily reminder of what happens when freaks and haters are allowed to impose their will on campus.

Read more at National Review

More about: Anti-Semitism, Columbia University, Israel on campus