Israeli politicians across the spectrum condemned the ICC prosecutor’s recent announcement, but they otherwise have little love for Benjamin Netanyahu. Last week, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant publicly criticized the prime minister for the absence of a clearly articulated plan for how Gaza will be ruled after Hamas’s defeat. This prompted Benny Gantz—who is the third member of the war cabinet along with Netanyahu and Gallant—to echo these criticisms in a speech of his own. Haviv Rettig Gur, in conversation with Dan Senor, explains what the controversy is all about, and its electoral implications. He also touches on the death of Ebrahim Raisi and the situation along the Israel-Lebanon border.

If there is to be peace, Palestinians will have to unlearn the hatred of Israel they have imbibed during nearly two decades of Hamas rule. This will be a difficult task, but Cole Aronson argues, drawing on the experiences of World War II, that Israel has already gotten off to a strong start:

The population’s compliance can . . . be won by a new regime that satisfies its immediate material needs, even if that new regime is sponsored by a government until recently at war with the population’s former regime. Axis civilians were made needy through bombing. Peaceful compliance with the Allies became a good alternative to supporting violent resistance to the Allies.

Israel’s current campaign makes a moderate Gaza more likely, not less. Destroying Hamas not only deprives Islamists of the ability to rule—it proves the futility of armed resistance to Israel, a condition for peace. The destruction of buildings not only deprives Hamas of its hideouts. It also gives ordinary Palestinians strong reasons to shun groups planning to replicate Hamas’s behavior.