If you’ve been following the news, you might have heard about the controversy stirred by the remarks of Adam Boehler, the new White House envoy for hostage negotiations. He referred to Israeli hostages as “prisoners” and jailed Palestinian terrorists as “hostages,” and admitted to meeting face-to-face with Hamas officials.
As Seth Mandel notes, there are some more substantive problems with his evaluation of Hamas’s “first offer” (that is, first offer to him) of a five-to-ten-year cease-fire: this is a familiar ploy, in which “Hamas offers a temporary truce so it can draw up an October 7-style truce-breaking extravaganza.” As for Boehler’s remark that the U.S. is “not an agent of Israel”—while certainly true—Mandel writes:
It was an astonishing and shameful thing to say, not only because it plays into tropes about Jewish manipulation but because Boehler’s way of negotiating with Hamas has been to make Israeli concession offers without Israel’s say-so.
At the same time, the editors of the Jerusalem Post observe that Israeli leaders have been less than judicious in their response:
Israel believes, justifiably, that meeting with Hamas is a mistake. It believes, rightfully, that Boehler’s rather sanguine reading of the situation is woefully unrealistic. . . . Express those concerns, let the administration and Boehler hear the criticism—but in private, not in public.
Everyone saw the way President Trump and Vice-President J.D. Vance responded in the Oval Office when the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky contradicted—in front of the cameras—the American policy on Ukraine and negotiations with Russia. . . . Israel needs to internalize this message, even when it comes to such a sensitive issue as direct talks with Hamas.
More about: Gaza War 2023, U.S.-Israel relationship