Blaming the Jews for a Kansas Shooting

Last month, Adam Purinton shot two Indian-Americans in a Kansas bar, killing one, after accusing them of being illegal immigrants and shouting ethnic slurs. He reportedly confessed to a bartender afterward that he shot “two Iranians.” In response, Trita Parsi—president of the lobbying organization the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) and an influential supporter of the nuclear deal with Tehran—produced an essay with a colleague placing responsibility for the attack not only on Donald Trump and his supporters but on anyone who called for the U.S. to take a tougher stand against Iran. Jonathan Zalman comments on the essay and on NIAC itself:

Per Parsi and [his coauthor Tyler] Cullis, journalists, think-tankers, and policy advocates who have allegedly demonized the Islamic Republic’s regime . . . bear some responsibility for the Kansas atrocity. More than a few people [have] noticed that the only people the authors called out by name—Michael Rubin, Eli Lake, Adam Kredo, Josh Block, and David Keyes—had one curious thing in common: they are all Jews.

Parsi and Cullis argue that these five, [who include] a Bloomberg columnist, the CEO of [the advocacy organization] The Israel Project, and the English-language spokesperson for Benjamin Netanyahu, “push war with Iran in the most hyperbolic terms, all the while defaming those—most particularly, those in the Iranian-American community—who urge a peaceful resolution to the historical tensions between the two countries.” The Kansas shooting, the authors argue, was the inevitable result of this group’s allegedly warmongering work. . . . The authors rhetorically connect . . . their perceived political opponents to a hate crime without going through the effort of proving that the shooter had drawn any inspiration from their work, or even knew that these five people existed. . . .

But these logical leaps represent the least of NIAC’s current issues, as the organization is now facing increasingly visible opposition from the constituency it claims to represent.

On February 20, a diverse group of over 100 Iranian-Americans and Iranian exiles, including former officials of both the shah and the current regime, submitted a letter to Senator Bob Corker and Congressman Ed Royce, the respective heads of the Senate and House Foreign Affairs committees, calling for “a congressional hearing on the efforts of Tehran’s theocratic regime to influence U.S. policy and public diplomacy toward Iran.” The letter, which . . . does not mention NIAC by name, . . . requested that Congress “launch an investigation into any and all lobbying activities of Iranian-American groups, which ostensibly promote the interests of our community but whose real goal is to undermine long-term U.S. national-security interests in Iran and its neighborhood.”

Read more at Tablet

More about: American politics, Anti-Semitism, Immigration, Iran nuclear program, Politics & Current Affairs, Racism

It’s Time for Haredi Jews to Become Part of Israel’s Story

Unless the Supreme Court grants an extension from a recent ruling, on Monday the Israeli government will be required to withhold state funds from all yeshivas whose students don’t enlist in the IDF. The issue of draft exemptions for Haredim was already becoming more contentious than ever last year; it grew even more urgent after the beginning of the war, as the army for the first time in decades found itself suffering from a manpower crunch. Yehoshua Pfeffer, a haredi rabbi and writer, argues that haredi opposition to army service has become entirely disconnected from its original rationale:

The old imperative of “those outside of full-time Torah study must go to the army” was all but forgotten. . . . The fact that we do not enlist, all of us, regardless of how deeply we might be immersed in the sea of Torah, brings the wrath of Israeli society upon us, gives a bad name to all of haredi society, and desecrates the Name of Heaven. It might still bring harsh decrees upon the yeshiva world. It is time for us to engage in damage limitation.

In Pfeffer’s analysis, today’s haredi leaders, by declaring that they will fight the draft tooth and nail, are violating the explicit teachings of the very rabbis who created and supported the exemptions. He finds the current attempts by haredi publications to justify the status quo not only unconvincing but insincere. At the heart of the matter, according to Pfeffer, is a lack of haredi identification with Israel as a whole, a lack of feeling that the Israeli story is also the haredi story:

Today, it is high time we changed our tune. The new response to the demand for enlistment needs to state, first and foremost to ourselves, that this is our story. On the one hand, it is crucial to maintain and even strengthen our isolation from secular values and culture. . . . On the other hand, this cultural isolationism must not create alienation from our shared story with our fellow brethren living in the Holy Land. Participation in the army is one crucial element of this belonging.

Read more at Tzarich Iyun

More about: Haredim, IDF, Israeli society