Why the U.S. Shouldn’t Succumb to European Pleas on Iran https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/politics-current-affairs/2018/04/why-the-u-s-shouldnt-succumb-to-european-pleas-on-iran/

April 25, 2018 | Richard Goldberg
About the author: Richard Goldberg is a senior advisor at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. He has served on Capitol Hill, on the U.S. National Security Council, as the chief of staff for Illinois’s governor, and as a Navy Reserve Intelligence Officer.

Since his arrival in Washington on Monday, the French president Emmanuel Macron has already spoken with President Trump about the future of the nuclear deal with Tehran, which the White House has committed itself either to strengthen or to abandon. Undoubtedly, the two have also spoken in private about the subject. Richard Goldberg urges the president not to compromise on the most important issues:

[L]ess than three weeks before Trump’s deadline [for extending the nuclear agreement], critical gaps [between Europe and the U.S.] remain. Europe won’t explicitly endorse the elimination of sunset dates and objects to any mechanism that would automatically re-impose sanctions if Iran cut the time in which it could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuke.

Europe is also willing to agree to powerful sanctions on Tehran only for the testing of long-range missiles that the regime doesn’t yet possess. As for missiles capable of wiping out Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, or the United Arab Emirates, the Europeans are willing to apply only mild and ineffectual sanctions. To avoid a transatlantic rift, Trump will face enormous pressure to follow suit. . . . Europe’s thirst for trade with Iran is so intense, apparently, it’s willing to sacrifice Israel and its Gulf allies to keep the money flowing. . . .

When Barack Obama sold the nuclear deal to Congress, he claimed that nothing would preclude the West from re-imposing sanctions [on Iran] for illicit non-nuclear activities. But it never happened, and without a formal transatlantic political agreement, the fear of jeopardizing the deal will always prevent it from happening. This sanctions paralysis regarding non-nuclear threats is one of the deal’s unspoken fatal flaws. That’s why Trump must ask Macron not only to acknowledge the legitimacy of such actions but pledge his support for them. If he won’t, Trump would be better off nixing the deal entirely.

Macron reportedly has a fallback plan in case Trump opts to nix the deal altogether: ask him not to enforce U.S. sanctions involving Europe and, instead, let Europe keep doing business with Iran. Trump should forcefully reject this request as well. Not enforcing sanctions lets the Iranian regime get wealthier and stronger, leading to increased funding for Bashar al-Assad, terrorism, proliferation, regional expansion, and repression. And North Korea will think Trump can be manipulated and will adjust its diplomatic strategy accordingly.

Read more on New York Post: https://nypost.com/2018/04/23/trump-shouldnt-give-in-to-macrons-iran-deal-request/