One of the myths about contemporary anti-Semitism is that there is a clear line dividing it from obsessive hatred of Israel; another is that it is not uncommon for today’s anti-Semites to support the Jewish state. But C.R. Rublin’s systematic study of anti-Israel Facebook groups shows a very different picture. Examining groups with such names as “Boycott Israel,” “BDS First,” and “Stand with Palestine”—with memberships ranging from 2,000 to 60,000—over the past three years, Rublin finds regular and frequent contributors who are self-identified neo-Nazis or white supremacists posting the most blatant and obscene anti-Semitic material:

The anti-Jewish incitement in these posts includes support for Nazi ideology, expressions of racial hatred, demonization of Jews (and specifically American Jews), conspiracy theories regarding Jewish plans to take control of the world and destroy Western moral values, and calls to action against Jews. . . . It is noteworthy that these posters are also generally against vaccinations, believe in various other conspiracy theories—primarily concerning 9/11 and “chemtrails”—and also deny the Holocaust. . . . [These] members of BDS and pro-Palestinian groups frequently demonize Jews, drawing on historical Christian anti-Semitic myths, Nazi-era propaganda, and more. . . .

On February 12, 2019, Rob Canery, [for instance], commented on a post in the “Boycott Israel . . . Support BDS” with regard to President Trump’s criticism of Congresswoman Ilhan Omar for her remarks about AIPAC: “He bows to the hebes!” In a comment on another post on the same topic, he wrote of Trump: “Joo puppet!” In the same group, he commented on a February 4, 2019 post about the Israel’s prime minister’s spouse Sara Netanyahu: “Inferior, ugly race!” . . .

Many neo-Nazi and white-supremacist members of BDS and pro-Palestinian groups express sympathy for and affinity with Nazi Germany and Hitler. . . . They see the plight of the Palestinians at the hands of Israelis as similar to the plight of the Germans at the hands of the Jews prior to World War II. The Jews, they claim, instigated World War II and the Germans fought a defensive war against the Jews, while the Palestinians are defending themselves against Israel. [Moreover], Holocaust denial is an accepted truth among virtually all members of these groups; they frequently use the term “Holohoax.” . . .

It is common for users in pro-Palestinian groups to compare Israel and Zionist behavior with the Nazi regime and Holocaust; many times neo-Nazi and white-supremacist members offended by this comparison will come to the defense of the Nazi regime. Several of these group members claim German ancestry, and their personal pages reference this heritage and feature photos of visits to Germany. . . .

Notably, administrators of these Facebook groups have not banned the users.

In his speech to the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, Joe Biden addressed a host of international issues, mentioning, inter alia, the “positive and practical impacts” resulting from “Israel’s greater normalization and economic connection with its neighbors.” He then added that the U.S. will “continue to work tirelessly to support a just and lasting peace between the Israelis and Palestinians—two states for two peoples.” Zach Kessel experiences some déjà vu:

Let’s take a stroll down memory lane and review how past U.S.-brokered talks between Jerusalem and [Palestinian leaders] have gone down, starting with 1991’s Madrid Conference, organized by then-President George H.W. Bush. . . . Though the talks, which continued through the next year, didn’t get anywhere concrete, many U.S. officials and observers across the world were heartened by the fact that Madrid was the first time representatives of both sides had met face to face. And then Palestinian militants carried out the first suicide bombing in the history of the conflict.

Then, in 1993, Bill Clinton tried his hand with the Oslo Accords:

In the period of time directly after the Oslo Accords . . . suicide bombings on buses and in crowded public spaces became par for the course. Clinton invited then-Palestinian Authority chairman Yasir Arafat and then-Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak to Camp David in 2000, hoping finally to put the conflict to rest. Arafat, who quite clearly aimed to extract as many concessions as possible from the Israelis without ever intending to agree to any deal—without even putting a counteroffer on the table—scuttled any possibility of peace. Of course, that’s not the most consequential event for the conflict that occurred in 2000. Soon after the Camp David Summit fell apart, the second intifada began.

Since Clinton, each U.S. president has entered office hoping to put together the puzzle that is an outcome acceptable to both sides, and each has failed. . . . Every time a deal has seemed to have legs, something happens—usually terrorist violence—and potential bargains are scrapped. What, then, makes Biden think this time will be any different?