How the U.S. Can Shape a Lasting Iran Policy with Elections on the Horizon

If Joe Biden wins the presidency in November, it is likely that his administration will try to negotiate an updated version of the 2015 nuclear agreement with the Islamic Republic. Despite this possibility, there is still much that the current administration can do now to increase pressure on the ayatollahs. Jacob Nagel and Mark Dubowitz write:

For starters, the administration should swiftly blacklist the Islamic Republic’s entire financial sector, thereby expelling the remaining thirteen Iranian banks from the SWIFT financial messaging system. . . . The administration should also [fill other] gaps in the U.S. sanctions regime. This should include more sanctions targeting the regime’s support for terrorism, its ballistic-missile program, and its human-rights abuses and corruption.

Republicans should also make clear, through the passage of a congressional resolution, that the lifting of sanctions by a Biden administration would be temporary and that such a move does not change the market’s views of Tehran’s illicit conduct. International companies should expect to lose their investments in Iran if Republicans retake power in four years and reinstate all sanctions.

Moreover, the effects of such sanctions would improve Washington’s bargaining position if any president were to reopen nuclear negotiations. Nagel and Dubowitz also urge a possible future Democratic White House to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 2015 agreement:

First, the U.S. should reinforce the efforts of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), [which in turn] should continue its demand for full Iranian compliance with existing agreements, including the one agreed to last week that gave the agency visitation rights at two sites where the Iranians allegedly concealed illicit nuclear activities in violation of their Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations.

While the IAEA pursues its mandate, the intelligence services of the U.S., Israel, and other Western powers should continue clandestine efforts to stop Iran’s illegal nuclear program and terrorist activities. . . . The U.S., Israel, and others possibly involved should continue to hit Iranian nuclear facilities and missile and military infrastructure, as well as Iranian and proxy forces in the region. The Obama administration made the mistake of tying the hands of U.S. and foreign intelligence services. That’s leverage Washington must use against Tehran.

Read more at FDD

More about: 2020 Election, Iran nuclear program, Iran sanctions, Joseph Biden, U.S. Foreign policy

How Columbia Failed Its Jewish Students

While it is commendable that administrators of several universities finally called upon police to crack down on violent and disruptive anti-Israel protests, the actions they have taken may be insufficient. At Columbia, demonstrators reestablished their encampment on the main quad after it had been cleared by the police, and the university seems reluctant to use force again. The school also decided to hold classes remotely until the end of the semester. Such moves, whatever their merits, do nothing to fix the factors that allowed campuses to become hotbeds of pro-Hamas activism in the first place. The editors of National Review examine how things go to this point:

Since the 10/7 massacre, Columbia’s Jewish students have been forced to endure routine calls for their execution. It shouldn’t have taken the slaughter, rape, and brutalization of Israeli Jews to expose chants like “Globalize the intifada” and “Death to the Zionist state” as calls for violence, but the university refused to intervene on behalf of its besieged students. When an Israeli student was beaten with a stick outside Columbia’s library, it occasioned little soul-searching from faculty. Indeed, it served only as the impetus to establish an “Anti-Semitism Task Force,” which subsequently expressed “serious concerns” about the university’s commitment to enforcing its codes of conduct against anti-Semitic violators.

But little was done. Indeed, as late as last month the school served as host to speakers who praised the 10/7 attacks and even “hijacking airplanes” as “important tactics that the Palestinian resistance have engaged in.”

The school’s lackadaisical approach created a permission structure to menace and harass Jewish students, and that’s what happened. . . . Now is the time finally to do something about this kind of harassment and associated acts of trespass and disorder. Yale did the right thing when police cleared out an encampment [on Monday]. But Columbia remains a daily reminder of what happens when freaks and haters are allowed to impose their will on campus.

Read more at National Review

More about: Anti-Semitism, Columbia University, Israel on campus