Remembering an American Scholar-Diplomat Who Saw the True Imbalance in the Arab-Israeli Conflict https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/politics-current-affairs/2021/03/remembering-an-american-scholar-diplomat-who-saw-the-true-imbalance-in-the-arab-israeli-conflict/

March 31, 2021 | Charles Hill
About the author:

On Saturday, the diplomat, scholar, and teacher Charles Hill died at the age of eighty-four. During his long career in public service, he served as an aide to Henry Kissinger and George P. Shultz; he was also deputy director of the State Department’s Israel desk before serving as political counselor to the American embassy in Tel Aviv, then director of Israel and Arabi-Israeli affairs, and after that deputy assistant secretary for the Middle East. A reminiscence by the Mosaic contributor Eric Edelman can be found here; some recent articles by Hill here; and Hill’s reflections on war and human nature here. In this 2019 essay on the idea of “balance” in the Arab-Israeli conflict, Hill saw far beyond the usual complaints that the U.S. needs to take a more “balanced” approach to the Israeli-Arab conflict:

In the aftermath of the Six-Day War, . . . Arabs insisted that every aspect of the conflict be agreed upon all at once by all relevant parties, ideally at a huge international conference. To do anything less would besmirch Arab honor and be unacceptable to the Arab nation as a whole. Israelis recognized this as a lopsided approach that would overwhelm their interests entirely.

A state of Palestine, agreed up front, would transform the regional and international context. With such a decision, all other issues between Israel and Palestine would remain to be directly negotiated with one exception, also needed to restore balance: the Palestinian side would have to give up, in principle, their claim to the right of return; the Israeli side would give up, in principle, their claim to the right of settlement.

This is the fundamental trade-off between the two parties, but it has been kept deeply out of balance because of international pressure on Israel to concede its right without pressure on the Palestinians to match such a concession. With these two major decisions, a balance could enhance the possibility of positive negotiating outcomes on all other issues.

Read more on Caravan: https://www.hoover.org/research/unbalanced