The Lieberman Open Orthodox Haggadah, which contains essays and commentary by several figures in the eponymous liberal wing of Orthodox Judaism, attempts to do more than present a new version of the Passover liturgy. Rather, writes Alan Brill, it aims self-consciously to set “an agenda for the future of Orthodoxy”:

Willy-nilly, one finds oneself reading about the problem of women unable to obtain halakhic divorces while everyone is singing Dayenu and about the rapid downfall of a local rabbi who violated everyone’s trust while everyone is singing Ḥad Gadya. For many, these juxtapositions will be their first impression of this Haggadah. . . .

There is no significant use of historical context, [academic Jewish studies], or source criticism. The volume is not aimed at those who seek an intellectual discussion. Its audience is not seeking aesthetics or [a synthesis of Torah and secular thought]. In addition, there is focus neither on the Holocaust nor on the state of Israel. . . . [This Haggadah] was not written for intellectual or spiritual edification, or for those who want to hear about how God took us out from Egypt with a strong hand and outstretched arm.

In short, this Haggadah oozes moxie and a direct appeal to those who like the Orthodox lifestyle but find a tension with what they perceive as the abuses of the system. For them, they do not need reasons for the commandments, rather an active commitment, determination, and ability to overcome their social concerns. All who are hungry for this moxie, let them come and eat.

On Tuesday, a Hizballah drone attack injured three people in northern Israel. The next day, another attack, targeting an IDF base, injured eighteen people, six of them seriously, in Arab al-Amshe, also in the north. This second attack involved the simultaneous use of drones carrying explosives and guided antitank missiles. In both cases, the defensive systems that performed so successfully last weekend failed to stop the drones and missiles. Ron Ben-Yishai has a straightforward explanation as to why: the Lebanon-backed terrorist group is getting better at evading Israel defenses. He explains the three basis systems used to pilot these unmanned aircraft, and their practical effects:

These systems allow drones to act similarly to fighter jets, using “dead zones”—areas not visible to radar or other optical detection—to approach targets. They fly low initially, then ascend just before crashing and detonating on the target. The terrain of southern Lebanon is particularly conducive to such attacks.

But this requires skills that the terror group has honed over months of fighting against Israel. The latest attacks involved a large drone capable of carrying over 50 kg (110 lbs.) of explosives. The terrorists have likely analyzed Israel’s alert and interception systems, recognizing that shooting down their drones requires early detection to allow sufficient time for launching interceptors.

The IDF tries to detect any incoming drones on its radar, as it had done prior to the war. Despite Hizballah’s learning curve, the IDF’s technological edge offers an advantage. However, the military must recognize that any measure it takes is quickly observed and analyzed, and even the most effective defenses can be incomplete. The terrain near the Lebanon-Israel border continues to pose a challenge, necessitating technological solutions and significant financial investment.