Tomorrow, the weekly Torah reading is focused on the story of Abraham. This reading contains a strange episode in which the biblical patriarch tells the Egyptians that Sarah is not his wife but his sister, after which Pharaoh has her brought to her palace. A similar episode happens in next week’s parashah, and yet again with Abraham’s son Isaac later on. Medieval commentators like Moses Nahmanides and David Kimhi criticized Abraham for his behavior, whereas other rabbinic sources appear to defend him.
Lawrence Schiffman describes the discomfort Second Temple-era Jewish writers felt about this episode, and the ways they tried to interpret it away:
The Genesis Apocryphon, [found among the Dead Sea Scrolls], dealt with this issue by its explanation that Abraham received divine revelation through a dream that essentially commanded him to follow this disingenuous approach. The book of Jubilees, [included in the Scripture of Ethiopian Jews and many Christians], on the other hand, chose to narrate the story fully only once and to abbreviate and/or to skip it in the second and third accounts. Josephus essentially stayed close to the Bible in the first episode, skipped the lying in the second, and essentially omitted the third occurrence.
Clearly, the author of Jubilees also took this approach out of discomfort with Abraham’s behavior. Similar feelings no doubt motivated Josephus.
Read more at Reading Jewish History in the Parsha
More about: Abraham, ancient Judaism, Biblical commentary, Genesis, Hebrew Bible