Solidarity with Journalists, But Not with Jews?

Jan. 12 2015

Sunday’s massive march in France was “a wonderful sight in many ways,” writes Elliott Abrams, “and represents France’s rejection of efforts to crush freedom of expression and especially to ban criticism of Islam.” But, he argues:

[I]n addition to the ubiquitous “Je suis Charlie” slogans, it would have been nice to see more “Je suis Juif” signs as well. After all, the journalists of Charlie Hebdo knew exactly what risks they were running. Their offices had already been bombed, and the constant presence of two police guards . . . was a powerful reminder of the dangers. The French Jews who were murdered were just shoppers, preparing for the Sabbath. . . .

And suppose that last week’s terror attack in Paris had not aimed at Charlie Hebdo, but “only” killed four Jews—or eight or twelve, for that matter. Does anyone believe a million French citizens would be marching in Paris, with scores of world leaders joining them? . . .

This week in Paris, numerous synagogues did not hold Sabbath services, Jewish schools were closed, and community events were cancelled or postponed. Those that went ahead did so under very heavy police guard, and that guard will be maintained for a long time. French Jews and other European Jews may well decide that when they can live, work, and practice their religion only under the highest levels of protection, surrounded by special police brigades, it is time to leave. The brave journalists of Charlie Hebdo, after all, took risks with their lives—but not with the lives of their children.

Read more at Pressure Points

More about: Anti-Semitism, Charlie Hebdo, European Islam, France, French Jewry

How Did Qatar Become Hamas’s Protector?

July 14 2025

How did Qatar, an American ally, become the nerve center of the leading Palestinian jihadist organization? Natalie Ecanow explains.

When Jordan expelled Hamas in 1999, Qatar offered sanctuary to the group, which had already become notorious for using suicide-bombing attacks over the previous decade. . . . Hamas chose to relocate to Syria. However, that arrangement lasted for only a decade. With the outbreak of the Syrian civil war, the terror group found its way back to Qatar.

In 2003, Hamas leaders reportedly convened in Qatar after the IDF attempted to eliminate Hamas’s founder, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, following a Hamas suicide bombing in Jerusalem that killed seven people, including two American citizens. This episode led to one of the first efforts by Qatar to advocate for its terror proxy.

Thirteen years and five wars between Hamas and Israel later, Qatar’s support for Hamas has not waned. . . . To this day, Qatari officials maintain that the office came at the “request from Washington to establish indirect lines of communication with Hamas.” However, an Obama White House official asserted that there was never any request from Washington. . . . Inexplicably, the United States government continues to rely on Qatar to negotiate for the release of the hostages held by Hamas, even as the regime hosts the terror group’s political elite.

A reckoning is needed between our two countries. Congressional hearings, legislation, executive orders, and other measures to regulate relations between our countries are long overdue.

Read more at FDD

More about: Gaza War 2023, Hamas, Qatar, U.S. Foreign policy