Why Sephardi and Mizrahi Approaches to Jewish Law Were Friendlier to the Zoom Seder https://mosaicmagazine.com/response/religion-holidays/2020/05/why-sephardi-and-mizrahi-approaches-to-jewish-law-were-friendlier-to-the-zoom-seder/

Lenient rulings in response to new situations are not necessary if unfortunate accommodations, they are instead a testament to the strength and durability of Judaism.

May 18, 2020 | Daniel Bouskila
About the author: Rabbi Daniel Bouskila is the director of the Sephardic Educational Center in Jerusalem and Los Angeles and the rabbi of the Westwood Village Synagogue.
This is a response to In Rejecting the Zoom Seder, What Did Orthodox Jews Affirm?, originally published in Mosaic in May 2020

An Israeli family at an online seder on April 8, 2020. Nati Shohat/Flash90.

As a member of the Association of Scholars of the Maghreb in the Land of Israel, which issued the now-famous Zoom-seder ruling, I am very grateful to Chaim Saiman for devoting his scholarly attentions to it, and for his careful analysis. In my response, I would like to focus my attention on the distinctively Sephardi and North African methods of legal decision-making that lay behind the ruling. In doing so, I not only wish to offer a better understanding of the mindset behind it, but also to provide a window into a philosophy of halakhah (Jewish law) that is different from the conventional Ashkenazi conceptions that inform Saiman’s essay.

Welcome to Mosaic

Create a free account to continue reading and you'll get two months of unlimited access to the best in Jewish thought, culture, and politics

Register Already a subscriber? Sign in now