How Al Jazeera’s Influence Seeps into American Media

Addressing the disorder in Los Angeles on social media, the Washington Post reporter Taylor Lorenz pushed the claim that the synagogue was hosting “a sale of Palestinian land,” and therefore what transpired should be understood as a political protest rather than an assault on a house of worship. This claim is true only if one considers every inch of Israel “Palestinian land.” Such misleading or mendacious statements about Israel have become de rigueur on the pages of the Washington Post, which has distinguished itself even among other America media outlets in its willingness to publish slanders of the Jewish state.

There are many reasons why this is so, but one points back to Qatar and its malign influence. Joseph Simonson writes:

At least six members of the Post’s foreign desk previously wrote for Al Jazeera, the Doha-based news outlet bankrolled in part by the government of Qatar, which is now sheltering Hamas’s top leaders. . . . They include the paper’s Middle East editor, Jesse Mesner-Hage, who spent more than a decade as an editor at the outlet’s English edition [and] the London correspondent Louisa Loveluck.

Just over a month after the October 7 terrorist attacks, the Post ran an A1 story titled, “Israel’s war with Hamas separates Palestinian babies from their mothers.” The story was rife with inaccuracies and misrepresentations. . . . A subsequent 230-word editor’s note attached to the piece said its reports “fell short of the Post’s standards for fairness.”

Loveluck’s is the lead byline on that report. Aside from her work with Al Jazeera, she previously worked as the Post’s Baghdad bureau chief. Loveluck’s work with Al Jazeera is omitted from her biography on the Post’s website.

Read more at Washington Free Beacon

More about: Al Jazeera, Gaza War 2023, Media, Qatar

How the U.S. Let Israel Down and Failed to Stand Up to Iran

Recent reports suggest that the White House has at last acted to allow the shipments of weapons that had been withheld from Israel and to end further the delays. On this topic, Elliott Abrams comments, “I don’t know what and how much has been held up, but it shouldn’t have happened. The level of delay should be zero.”

In this interview with Ariel Kahana, Abrams also comments on the failings of U.S. policy toward Iran, and the Biden administration’s refusal to enforce existing sanctions:

According to Abrams, Iran has indeed halted the advancement of its nuclear program on rare occasions. “This happened when Bush invaded Iraq in 2003, and when [President] Trump eliminated Qassem Suleimani in 2020. The U.S. needs to be ready to use force in Iran, but credibility is critical here. Only if [Iran’s leaders] are convinced that the U.S. is willing to act will they stop.”

Abrams claims that the U.S. president tried for two-and-a-half years to revive the nuclear deal with Iran until he realized it wasn’t interested. “Iran has benefited from this situation, and everyone outside the administration sees it as a failure.”

Read more at Israel Hayom

More about: Gaza War 2023, Iran, Iran nuclear program, U.S.-Israel relationship