A Newly Discovered Ancient Jar Bears a Biblical Name

At a site south of Jerusalem, archaeologists have found an inscription, “Ishbaal son of Beda,” on a clay storage jar. Ilan Ben Zion explains its significance:

Yosef Garfinkel . . . and Saar Ganor [who co-authored a paper on the inscription] said Tuesday this was the first time an inscription with the name Ishbaal had been discovered.

“It is interesting to note that the name Ishbaal appears in the Bible, and now also in the archaeological record, only during the reign of King David, in the first half of the 10th century BCE. This name was not used later in the First Temple period,” the two said. . . .

Five or six years ago, [Garfinkel] said, there were no known Judean inscriptions from the period associated with the biblical King David; now there are four, including that of Ishbaal.

Read more at Times of Israel

More about: Ancient Israel, Archaeology, Canaanites, Davidic monarchy, History & Ideas, King Saul

An American Withdrawal from Iraq Would Hand Another Victory to Iran

Since October 7, the powerful network of Iran-backed militias in Iraq have carried out 120 attacks on U.S. forces stationed in the country. In the previous year, there were dozens of such attacks. The recent escalation has led some in the U.S. to press for the withdrawal of these forces, whose stated purpose in the country is to stamp out the remnants of Islamic State and to prevent the group’s resurgence. William Roberts explains why doing so would be a mistake:

American withdrawal from Iraq would cement Iran’s influence and jeopardize our substantial investment into the stabilization of Iraq and the wider region, threatening U.S. national security. Critics of the U.S. military presence argue that [it] risks a regional escalation in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. However, in the long term, the U.S. military has provided critical assistance to Iraq’s security forces while preventing the escalation of other regional conflicts, such as clashes between Turkey and Kurdish groups in northern Iraq and Syria.

Ultimately, the only path forward to preserve a democratic, pluralistic, and sovereign Iraq is through engagement with the international community, especially the United States. Resisting Iran’s takeover will require the U.S. to draw international attention to the democratic backsliding in the country and to be present and engage continuously with Iraqi civil society in military and non-military matters. Surrendering Iraq to Iran’s agents would not only squander our substantial investment in Iraq’s stability; it would greatly increase Iran’s capability to threaten American interests in the Levant through its influence in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon.

Read more at Providence

More about: Iran, Iraq, U.S. Foreign policy