In response to reports that Hamas is negotiating independently with Israel for a long-term cease-fire, Mahmoud Abbas has announced the resignation of the Palestinian Authority’s “unity government.” While the collapse of the Fatah-Hamas coalition—largely fictive to begin with—is unlikely to have any practical effects, Jonathan Tobin detects lessons to be learned from it:
[T]hose advocating unilateral recognition for Palestinian statehood need to draw some conclusions from these events. There are already two rival Palestinian entities that pretend to sovereignty, but neither is truly representative or the least bit interested in ending the conflict [with Israel]. Indeed, the PA that is held out by the Obama administration as a champion of peace turns out to be even less enthusiastic about avoiding bloodshed than Hamas. If you are advocating a Palestinian state now without peace with Israel, the question remains which one do you want: a corrupt kleptocracy that is still incapable of making peace because of ideology and its fear of being outflanked by Islamists, or a corrupt Islamist terrorist tyranny? For the foreseeable future, those are your only choices.
More about: Hamas, Israel & Zionism, Mahmoud Abbas, Palestinian Authority, Palestinian statehood, Palestinian Unity government