Last week, the EU sent its senior diplomat to pressure Jerusalem to resume negotiations with the Palestinian Authority; meanwhile, France is readying a UN Security Council resolution designed to force Palestinian statehood by the end of 2016. These efforts have no chance of succeeding, writes Efraim Inbar:
The Palestinian national movement seems unable to reach a historic compromise with the Zionist movement. It still insists on exclusive control of the Temple Mount, on a “right of return” for refugees, and on removal of all Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria. Its media and education system perpetuate the conflict by teaching hatred of Jews and denigrating their links to the land of Israel. . . . It is totally unrealistic to expect an agreement on final-status issues in the near future. . . .
In addition, Palestinians have failed to capitalize on the opportunity to build a state. The most remarkable failure—and the one most devastating to their state-building attempt—was the loss of the monopoly over the use of force. This led to chaos and to the loss of Gaza to Hamas in 2007. As long as Hamas plays a central role in Palestinian affairs, no real Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation is possible. What happened in the Palestinian territories reflects a phenomenon widespread in the Arab world—the collapse of statist structures. . . .
Therefore, a resolution to the conflict is not in the cards. The best that can be achieved is interim agreements, tacit or formal, that do not entail grave security risks for Israel. Conflict management is the only approach that has a chance to minimize suffering on both sides and achieve a modicum of stability in a stormy Middle East.
More about: Europe and Israel, European Union, France, Israel & Zionism, Palestinian statehood, Peace Process