Mosaic Magazine

Response to: "What Happened at Lydda"July 2014

The Uses of Lydda

How a confusing urban battle between two sides was transformed into a one-sided massacre of helpless victims.

The Uses of Lydda
  

In “What Happened at Lydda,” Martin Kramer has performed a signal service by putting to rest the canard of an Israeli massacre of Palestinian Arab civilians in that city in July 1948. The charge has been most recently circulated by Ari Shavit in his best-selling My Promised Land. But Lydda is hardly the only instance of such allegations at the time of the founding of the Jewish state—or, for that matter, long afterward. As Kramer suggests at the outset of his investigation, “time and again over the decades, Israeli soldiers have stood accused of just such wanton killing when in fact they were doing what every soldier is trained to do: fire on an armed enemy, especially when that enemy is firing at him.”

Indeed. In late 1947, a violent Arab attempt was made to prevent the creation of a Jewish state in line with November’s UN partition resolution. No sooner had the Haganah rebuffed it than it was accused of scores of nonexistent massacres. The same happened in the run-up to the establishment of the state in May 1948 and the ensuing war launched by the Arab nations to destroy it. The fall of the city of Haifa in April 1948 gave rise to totally false claims of a large-scale slaughter that circulated throughout the Middle East and reached Western capitals. Similarly false rumors were spread after the fall of Tiberias (April 18), during the battle of Safed (in early May), and in Jaffa, where in late April the mayor fabricated a massacre of “hundreds of Arab men and women.” Accounts of a massacre at Deir Yasin (April 9), where some 100 people died, were especially lurid, featuring supposed hammer-and-sickle tattoos on the arms of Jewish fighters and fictitious charges of havoc and rape.

In later years, Palestinians and supporters of the Palestinian cause have even invented retroactive atrocities, unknown to anyone at the time of their supposed occurrence. A notable instance is the “Tantura massacre” of May 1948, an event glaringly absent from contemporary Palestinian Arab historiography of the war. And this is not to mention more recent trumped-up allegations of atrocities committed by Israel in, most notoriously, Jenin (2002) and Gaza (2009).

 

It is into this crowded field that the prominent Israeli journalist Ari Shavit has stepped. “In 30 minutes, at high noon, more than 200 civilians are killed,” Shavit writes dramatically; “Zionism carries out a massacre in the city of Lydda.” But as Kramer conclusively shows, it is likelier that there was no massacre: only casualties of war, killed or wounded in the fierce fighting between the small Israeli force in the city and the numerically superior force of local Arab fighters supplemented by Transjordanian troops and armored vehicles.

In its broad contours, the story of the conquest of Lydda, followed by the exodus of most of the city’s residents, was a matter of public knowledge shortly after the July 1948 events about which Shavit writes; in subsequent decades, Israeli historians filled in the remaining gaps. But then, beginning in the late 1980s, revisionist Israeli “New Historians” successfully transformed what the New York Times had described at the time as “heavy casualties,” incurred in the course of “considerable [Arab] resistance,” into a massacre of hapless victims.

Since Lydda (together with the simultaneously captured twin town of Ramleh) also constitutes the only case in the war where a substantial urban population was displaced by Israeli forces, the massacre trope won a position of pivotal importance in the larger Arab claim: namely, that there was a premeditated and systematic plan to dispossess and expel the Palestinian Arabs. Shavit has picked up this latter misrepresentation as well, writing that “the conquest of Lydda and the expulsion of Lydda” were “an inevitable phase of the Zionist revolution” (emphasis added).

If, however, there was anything inevitable about the expulsion of Lydda, the cause lay not in Zionism but in the actions of Palestinian Arab leaders and their counterparts in neighboring Arab states. Had these notables accepted the UN partition resolution calling for the establishment of two states in Palestine, there would have been no war and no dislocation in the first place. As for Lydda itself, no exodus was foreseen in Israeli military plans for the city’s capture or was reflected in the initial phase of its occupation. Quite the contrary: the Israeli commander assured local dignitaries that the city’s inhabitants would be allowed to stay if they so wished. In line with that promise, the occupying Israeli force also requested a competent administrator and other personnel to run the affairs of the civilian population.

All this was rendered irrelevant when the city’s notables and residents, rather than abiding by their surrender agreement with the IDF, attempted to dislodge the Israelis by force. The IDF, its tenuous grip on Lydda starkly exposed, thereupon decided to “encourage” the population’s departure to Arab-controlled areas a few miles to the east, so as not to leave behind a potential hotbed of armed resistance. In an area where Jordan’s Arab Legion was counterattacking in strength, it was essential to prevent any disruption of ongoing war operations.

As it happens, this spontaneous response by the IDF to a string of unexpected developments on the ground was uncharacteristic of general Israeli conduct. Then and throughout the war, inhabitants of other Arab localities who had peacefully surrendered to Israeli forces were allowed to remain in place. In this respect, Lydda was an one of the very few exceptions that proved the rule, not—as Shavit argues—the rule itself.

Those few exceptions, moreover, accounted for but a small fraction of the total exodus. Vastly more Palestinians were driven from their homes by their own leaders and/or by Arab military forces than by the Israeli army. In fact, no contemporary sources describe the collapse and dispersal of Palestinian society as, in Shavit’s words, “an inevitable phase of the Zionist revolution.” Here, from June 1949, is the (somewhat surprised) report of a senior British official from a fact-finding mission among Arab war refugees in Gaza:

While [the refugees] express no bitterness against the Jews (or for that matter against the Americans or ourselves), they speak with the utmost bitterness of the Egyptians and other Arab states. “We know who our enemies are,” they will say, and they are referring to their Arab brothers who, they declare, persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes.

Martin Kramer is to be congratulated for helping to reclaim these historical truths, distorted by decades of propaganda and revisionist history. In disposing of the Lydda “massacre” canard, he has also exposed the disingenuous and shoddy scholarship underlying the ongoing endeavor to rewrite Israel’s history.

___________________

Efraim Karsh is professor of Middle East and Mediterranean Studies at King’s College London, a senior researcher at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies and at the Middle East Forum, and the author most recently of Palestine Betrayed (Yale, 2010).

Comments

  • AZ

    This is nice, but where is the response from Ari Shavit?

    • Sirius

      Good question. Ask Shavit: why is he mum?

  • gs

    Yes, this is nice, but where is the response from David Brooks and David Remnick and Jeffrey Goldberg.

    • gs

      And Leon Wieseltier?

  • bikkurim

    Viewing the UN Partition map with Dr. Robert O. Freedman, Americans for Peace Now official, he shared with me the view that the Partition Plan, in fact, set up Lod and Ramle as a 5th Column behind the Israeli lines. Having long dealt with APN’s fictions, I was taken by surprise with his acknowledgement of this fact.

  • CT

    Here are some newspaper articles from 1948 on Lydda. They show Shavit’s distortions:

    “Capture of Lydda and Ramle halts the Arab threat to Tel Aviv, affords the Jews a base from which to keep the Jerusalem life-line open”
    7-12-48, St. Joseph Gazette
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=VJOaslTFpLQC&dat=19480712&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    “Large quantities of ammunition, in addition to heavy guns, airplane engines and armored vehicles fell into Jewish hands…When the battle seemed nearly over, 100 mixed Arab troops, whom Jews said were commanded by British officers, barricaded themselves in Lydda’s fortress-like central police station.”
    7-13-48, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=gL9scSG3K_gC&dat=19480713&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    “Israel…reported two counter-attacks by merchanized Arab columns against Lydda. Guns hamered away around the rocky approaches to the Judean hills within sight of Lydda and Er Ramle, which the Jews captured after two days of fighting.”
    7-13-48, The Calgary Herald
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=Hx6RvaqUy9IC&dat=19480713&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    And here are articles on context that Shavit left out (that Israel was asking for peace and that Arabs were pursuing war):

    “[Israel] called on the United Nations to end the fighting in Palestine once and for all by ‘branding the Arabs aggressors’ and applying all possible sanctions against them.”
    7-11-48 Herald-Journal
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=SFOYbPikdlgC&dat=19480711&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    “King Ibn Saud…said he would cancel American oil concessions if the United Nations Security Council tried to impose sanctions on Arabs…”
    7-13-48 Meriden Record
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=GKX6TSFDq9oC&dat=19480713&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    “The Arabs advanced…seizing seven villages…Jerusalem was dive-bombed…Tel Aviv and eight Jewish settlements were also raided…Iraqi troops infiltrated [the] outskirts of Haifa.”
    7-12-48 Ludington Daily News
    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=b0M2c_1WBrUC&dat=19480712&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    There”s also a video at Palwatch org with Abbas stating that people from his own village – Safed – fled because of fear of retribution for a massacre of Jews that they had committed, although Shavit refers to “conquest” of Safed.

    And there’s a YouTube channel (“MideastWatcher”) with videos containing many news archives disproving the Palestinian narrative.

  • Jerry Blaz

    From the fog of war we come to the armchair fogies of war, each trying to make brownie points with their respective audiences, audiences geared to hear specific slants on the narrative of Lydda, but in the end, amidst the killing toll of Jews and Arabs that continues as we read, I wonder if it really matters.

Freundel Wertheimer

Can Modern Orthodoxy Survive?

The Unresolved Dilemmas of Modern Orthodoxy
Everyone agrees that the movement needs to rethink and revamp. Very few agree on how.
By Jack Wertheimer

Academia

Academia

"Gaza = Auschwitz"
Holocaust inversion—the claim that Israelis are the new Nazis and Palestinians the new Jews—has come to the American university campus.
By Martin Kramer

Facebook Like Box

Koss

Tradition, Tradition

Busting the Shtetl Myth
What you think you know about Jewish life in Eastern Europe is wrong, argues a fascinating (but problematic) new book.
by Andrew N. Koss

Fiddler

Tevye Betrayed

What’s Wrong with Fiddler on the Roof
Fifty years on, no work by or about Jews has won American hearts so thoroughly. So what's my problem?
By Ruth R. Wisse

Horn Surnames

What's In A Name

Jewish Surnames [Supposedly] Explained
“Dara, you’ll love this!” Actually, I don’t.
by Dara Horn

Benjamin

The Intellectual Scene

The Walter Benjamin Brigade
How an original but maddeningly opaque German Jewish intellectual became a thriving academic industry.
by Walter Laqueur

Golinkin

Conservative and Orthodox

The Crisis in Jewish Law Today
Orthodox rabbis need to stop worrying about 200-year-old battles with “Reformers” and allow Jewish law to develop organically, as it did in the past.
By David Golinkin

Kook

History

Abraham Isaac Kook Receives the Call
For a visionary rabbi in London, the Balfour Declaration of 1917 signified nothing less than the advent of the messianic era.
by Yehudah Mirsky

Gurfinkiel

The Situation in Europe

You Only Live Twice
Vibrant Jewish communities were reborn in Europe after the Holocaust. Is there a future for them in the 21st century?
by Michel Gurfinkiel

Degenerate Art

The Art World

Degenerate Art and the Jewish Grandmother
The story of the family behind the Nazi-era art trove.
By Walter Laqueur

Wertheimer

The September Essay

Intermarriage: Can Anything Be Done?
A half-century after the rate of intermarriage in the US began to skyrocket, the Jewish community appears to have resigned itself to the inevitable. But to declare defeat is preposterous.
by Jack Wertheimer

Aharon L

The Rabbinic World

Who Is Aharon Lichtenstein?
Introducing the extraordinary rabbi who next week will receive Israel’s highest honor.
By Elli Fischer

Rubinstein

Yom Hashoah

Making Amends
A mysterious request leads the Canadian-born son of a Holocaust survivor back to the old country.
by Robert Eli Rubinstein