Israel has implemented increasingly strict measures to combat the coronavirus; as of yesterday, Israelis are forbidden to go more than 100 meters (roughly 325 feet) from home without some permissible purpose. In return, the citizenry has shown a great willingness to make the sacrifices necessary to contain the disease, writes Alex Selsky:

Israelis are showing every day that they are prepared to suffer in the short term for a long-term good. The public trusts its officials to make the right decisions and to balance the possible loss of life with national-security interests. They understand that sometimes ultimate victory comes with pain. [At the same time], Israelis place an inordinately high value on life. We see how the public mourns for people they did not know and never met. Our nation is one big family connected by minute degrees of separation.

Israel is also a country that understands the value of sacrifice. We still vaunt the battle of Tel Ḥai a century ago, and speak with reverence about the actions of Ro’i Klein, killed in 2006 in the battle of Bint Jbeil in Lebanon after he jumped on a grenade to save his fellow IDF soldiers.

Selsky argues that this is evidence that the Jewish state can face other hardships, such as those that might come as it confronts the constant rocket and incendiary-balloon attacks from Gaza, or the threat of war with Hizballah to its north:

More often than not, [Israeli] political decisionmakers [confronted by lethal attacks] decide to bomb a few empty buildings and then seek a truce with the offending party, whether Hamas or Palestine Islamic Jihad. When one asks political and security officials intimately involved why the response is so extremely limited, many argue that the public does not have the stomach for lengthy wars with large casualty figures.

They are mistaken, and now we have some evidence. Israeli decisionmakers should look at [Israelis’ recent display of] fortitude and resilience [when considering how to deal with the country’s] enemies who are starting to see large cracks forming in its deterrence. Our southern residents, who bear the greatest brunt of the Gaza terrorist menace, are usually the ones calling for a most robust approach. They know that if Israel reacts forcefully, perhaps more aggressively than ever before, they are likely to spend many weeks and even months in and out of their bomb shelters and safe rooms.

While it is commendable that administrators of several universities finally called upon police to crack down on violent and disruptive anti-Israel protests, the actions they have taken may be insufficient. At Columbia, demonstrators reestablished their encampment on the main quad after it had been cleared by the police, and the university seems reluctant to use force again. The school also decided to hold classes remotely until the end of the semester. Such moves, whatever their merits, do nothing to fix the factors that allowed campuses to become hotbeds of pro-Hamas activism in the first place. The editors of National Review examine how things go to this point:

Since the 10/7 massacre, Columbia’s Jewish students have been forced to endure routine calls for their execution. It shouldn’t have taken the slaughter, rape, and brutalization of Israeli Jews to expose chants like “Globalize the intifada” and “Death to the Zionist state” as calls for violence, but the university refused to intervene on behalf of its besieged students. When an Israeli student was beaten with a stick outside Columbia’s library, it occasioned little soul-searching from faculty. Indeed, it served only as the impetus to establish an “Anti-Semitism Task Force,” which subsequently expressed “serious concerns” about the university’s commitment to enforcing its codes of conduct against anti-Semitic violators.

But little was done. Indeed, as late as last month the school served as host to speakers who praised the 10/7 attacks and even “hijacking airplanes” as “important tactics that the Palestinian resistance have engaged in.”

The school’s lackadaisical approach created a permission structure to menace and harass Jewish students, and that’s what happened. . . . Now is the time finally to do something about this kind of harassment and associated acts of trespass and disorder. Yale did the right thing when police cleared out an encampment [on Monday]. But Columbia remains a daily reminder of what happens when freaks and haters are allowed to impose their will on campus.