For an in-depth look at Iran’s war with Israel (and America), it’s worth watching this discussion, hosted by Mosaic’s Jonathan Silver, among the veteran foreign-policy hand Elliott Abrams, Senator Tom Cotton, and the scholar of Iran Ray Takeyh. Recorded on April 15, it remains acutely relevant, and perhaps even more so in light of recent events. Silver at one point asks Takeyh what he thinks the Iranians wanted to achieve with their missile and drone attack on Israel. His answer: “to kill a large number of people.” (Video, one hour.)

If there is to be peace, Palestinians will have to unlearn the hatred of Israel they have imbibed during nearly two decades of Hamas rule. This will be a difficult task, but Cole Aronson argues, drawing on the experiences of World War II, that Israel has already gotten off to a strong start:

The population’s compliance can . . . be won by a new regime that satisfies its immediate material needs, even if that new regime is sponsored by a government until recently at war with the population’s former regime. Axis civilians were made needy through bombing. Peaceful compliance with the Allies became a good alternative to supporting violent resistance to the Allies.

Israel’s current campaign makes a moderate Gaza more likely, not less. Destroying Hamas not only deprives Islamists of the ability to rule—it proves the futility of armed resistance to Israel, a condition for peace. The destruction of buildings not only deprives Hamas of its hideouts. It also gives ordinary Palestinians strong reasons to shun groups planning to replicate Hamas’s behavior.