The Lebanese Army Has Allied Itself with Hizballah

April 8 2016

In testimony before the House Foreign Affairs committee, Tony Badran documents the terrorist militia’s large arsenal of rockets and missiles, its increasing influence in Lebanon and Syria, and the danger it poses:

The partnership between the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and Hizballah has grown to such an extent that it is now meaningful to speak of the LAF as an auxiliary force in Hizballah’s war effort. . . . In certain instances, LAF troops and Hizballah forces have deployed troops jointly, such as during street battles with the followers of a minor Sunni cleric in Sidon in 2013. The LAF routinely raids Syrian refugee camps and Sunni cities in Lebanon, rounding up Sunni men and often detaining them without charges. . . .

The Israelis have no choice but to expect that if war should break out between them and Hizballah, the LAF will come to the direct aid of the latter. . . . In contrast to the policies of Israel and Saudi Arabia, the U.S. is not making its aid to the LAF contingent on its severing its operational ties with Hizballah—a policy which many in the Middle East see as facilitating the partnership between the two.

Iran and Hizballah clearly intend to leverage their success in Syria to change the balance of power with Israel. Specifically, they have set their sights on expanding into the Golan Heights, and on linking it to the south Lebanon front. . . .

As a result, the IDF is preparing for offensive incursions by Hizballah into northern Israel in the next conflict. For Israel, Hizballah’s use of Lebanon as an Iranian forward missile base, its expansion into Syria with an aim to link the Golan to Lebanon, and the prospect of this reality soon getting an Iranian nuclear umbrella, creates an unacceptable situation which, under the right circumstances, could easily trigger a major conflict.

Read more at Foundation for Defense of Democracies

More about: Golan Heights, Hizballah, Israeli Security, Lebanon, Politics & Current Affairs, Syria

A Bill to Combat Anti-Semitism Has Bipartisan Support, but Congress Won’t Bring It to a Vote

In October, a young Mauritanian national murdered an Orthodox Jewish man on his way to synagogue in Chicago. This alone should be sufficient sign of the rising dangers of anti-Semitism. Nathan Diament explains how the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act (AAA) can, if passed, make American Jews safer:

We were off to a promising start when the AAA sailed through the House of Representatives in the spring by a generous vote of 320 to 91, and 30 senators from both sides of the aisle jumped to sponsor the Senate version. Then the bill ground to a halt.

Fearful of antagonizing their left-wing activist base and putting vulnerable senators on the record, especially right before the November election, Democrats delayed bringing the AAA to the Senate floor for a vote. Now, the election is over, but the political games continue.

You can’t combat anti-Semitism if you can’t—or won’t—define it. Modern anti-Semites hide their hate behind virulent anti-Zionism. . . . The Anti-Semitism Awareness Act targets this loophole by codifying that the Department of Education must use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of anti-Semitism in its application of Title VI.

Read more at New York Post

More about: Anti-Semitism, Congress, IHRA