The difference between “BDS Russia” and “BDS Israel.”

In recent days, rumors have been circulating regarding the possibility of U.S. sanctions on Israel as punishment for settlement-building. Since such measures would undoubtedly be. . .

Hoping to attain a preliminary nuclear deal, the White House eased economic sanctions. Now Iran’s leaders have no incentive to negotiate. 

If our Iran diplomacy is not backed up by credible threats, Tehran will have little incentive to abide by any signed agreement.    

The collapse of sanctions against Iran since the interim deal highlights their weakness as a tool of coercion—especially in the hands of irresolute American leadership.

A nuclear Iran, no longer crippled by sanctions, would be able to extend its influence over the entire Persian Gulf—and its control over half of. . .

Solid bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress, along with the American public, support increased pressure on Iran. Will the Obama administration listen?

The big question is not how Washington will handle Tehran’s inevitable violations of the nuclear agreement struck over the weekend, but how it will. . .

The Obama administration justifies an easing of Iran sanctions on the grounds that they can be tightened again if Tehran violates its side of the. . .

Western sanctions have made it harder than ever for Iran to acquire the means to build a nuclear bomb; and yet it is still acquiring them.

Economic sanctions may not have deterred Iran from building a nuclear bomb, but they seem to have driven a boom in drug addiction.