Britain’s Holocaust Orphans

At the end of World War II, Britain took in 732 Jewish orphans who had been found in concentration camps and helped them to find homes. They remained closely connected to one another long after. Jenni Frazer tells their story:

Bela Rosenthal was three years old when she came to Britain in August 1945. She spoke no English and even her German was limited to a few words. . . . Born in Berlin, Bela was the youngest of six Jewish orphans liberated from the Theresienstadt concentration camp in Czechoslovakia in April 1945. . . .

In June 1945, the six were taken to houses outside Prague, while the Red Cross searched to see if there were still any surviving relations of the children. When none were found, on August 15, 1945 Bela became one of 301 children aboard a Lancaster bomber, bound for England.

Nine flights full of Jewish orphans left that day, making Bela part of an exclusive club—“the Boys”—known as such because . . . just 80 of them were girls. . . . In 1963 the Boys . . . established the 45 Aid Society, which has since raised thousands for other children’s charities.

Read more at Telegraph

More about: British Jewry, History & Ideas, Holocaust, United Kingdom, World War II

When It Comes to Iran, Israel Risks Repeating the Mistakes of 1973 and 2023

If Iran succeeds in obtaining nuclear weapons, the war in Gaza, let alone the protests on college campuses, will seem like a minor complication. Jonathan Schachter fears that this danger could be much more imminent than decisionmakers in Jerusalem and Washington believe. In his view, Israel seems to be repeating the mistake that allowed it to be taken by surprise on Simchat Torah of 2023 and Yom Kippur of 1973: putting too much faith in an intelligence concept that could be wrong.

Israel and the United States apparently believe that despite Iran’s well-documented progress in developing capabilities necessary for producing and delivering nuclear weapons, as well as its extensive and ongoing record of violating its international nuclear obligations, there is no acute crisis because building a bomb would take time, would be observable, and could be stopped by force. Taken together, these assumptions and their moderating impact on Israeli and American policy form a new Iran concept reminiscent of its 1973 namesake and of the systemic failures that preceded the October 7 massacre.

Meanwhile, most of the restrictions put in place by the 2015 nuclear deal will expire by the end of next year, rendering the question of Iran’s adherence moot. And the forces that could be taking action aren’t:

The European Union regularly issues boilerplate press releases asserting its members’ “grave concern.” American decisionmakers and spokespeople have created the unmistakable impression that their reservations about the use of force are stronger than their commitment to use force to prevent an Iranian atomic bomb. At the same time, the U.S. refuses to enforce its own sanctions comprehensively: Iranian oil exports (especially to China) and foreign-currency reserves have ballooned since January 2021, when the Biden administration took office.

Israel’s response has also been sluggish and ambiguous. Despite its oft-stated policy of never allowing a nuclear Iran, Israel’s words and deeds have sent mixed messages to allies and adversaries—perhaps inadvertently reinforcing the prevailing sense in Washington and elsewhere that Iran’s nuclear efforts do not present an exigent crisis.

Read more at Hudson Institute

More about: Gaza War 2023, Iran nuclear program, Israeli Security, Yom Kippur War